...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >Competition, Knowledge, and Institutions
【24h】

Competition, Knowledge, and Institutions

机译:竞争,知识与制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The development of new institutional economics (NIE) has been a huge advancement in economics. Despite attempts to integrate concepts such as bounded rationality, however, NIE has predominantly remained a neoclassical, equilibrium-oriented theory which primarily studies institutions only in regard to their effects on allocative efficiency, that is, in regard to transaction and agency costs. This article analyzes the effects of institutions if instead of a neoclassical concept of competition an evolutionary concept of competition in the tradition of Friedrich Hayek and Joseph Schumpeter is used. Based upon earlier work of Wolfgang Kerber (1996, 1997) and Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (2001), it is shown that the institutional framework for markets influences both the dynamics and the direction of knowledge-generation in competition processes, in which innovations are generated and tested in the market. Or to put it differently: The institutional framework influences the selection environment of the market and therefore channels the development of knowledge in evolutionary competition processes. The paper can also be seen as an attempt at a greater integration of institutional and evolutionary economics.
机译:新制度经济学(NIE)的发展是经济学的巨大进步。尽管试图整合诸如有限理性之类的概念,但是,NIE仍然主要是一种新古典,以均衡为导向的理论,该理论主要研究机构对分配效率的影响,即交易和代理成本。如果使用弗里德里希·哈耶克(Friedrich Hayek)和约瑟夫·熊彼特(Joseph Schumpeter)的传统演进的竞争概念代替竞争的新古典概念,则本文将分析制度的影响。基于Wolfgang Kerber(1996,1997)和Chrysostomos Mantzavinos(2001)的早期工作,表明市场的制度框架影响竞争过程中知识生成的动力和方向,其中创新的产生和检验在市场上。或者换句话说:制度框架影响市场的选择环境,因此在进化竞争过程中引导知识的发展。这篇论文也可以看作是将制度经济学与进化经济学进一步融合的尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号