首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >Tipping the Balance Scale? Rightward Momentum, Party Agency and Austrian Party Politics
【24h】

Tipping the Balance Scale? Rightward Momentum, Party Agency and Austrian Party Politics

机译:小费天平?右倾势力,党的机构和奥地利政党政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Austrian mainstream parties perpetuated one of the longest standing grand coalition governments across Western Europe. Over at least two decades, the balance of power had shifted firmly toward the ideological right. The post-war Austrian party system has lacked viable centre parties and has failed to produce a green party on the scale of importance of those of many of its West European neighbours. It does not have workers parties apart from the mainstream Social Democratic Party of Austria (Sozialdemokratische Partei OEslerreichs, SPO). The lack of depth or options for coalition-building on the political left in the Austrian party system has produced unique opportunities for coalition governments on the right in the early twenty-first century. Yet, Austrian parties on the right proved seemingly unable to capitalize upon such opportunities in order to entrench a right of centre bloc of power. Despite the break with grand coalition government in 1999 to form the coalition government between the Austrian People's Party (OEsterreichische Volkspartei, OEVP) and the Freedom Party of Austria (Freiheitliche Partei OEsterreichs, FPOE), the OEVP-SPOE government made a rather non-triumphant return in 2006 and again through snap elections of 2008. This article explores the difficulties encountered by parlies in their attempts to capitalize upon the potential for sustaining a right power bloc by examining the strategic alignments and interaction between Austria's parties froml990-2012. It considers the trajectory of the parties electorally and in public office or opposition, examining the context and strategies employed at various points and especially as fortunes change. It argues that the Austrian far right traded the goal of policy for that of votes and later office, all the while becoming more domesticated and vulnerable to co-optation when in office. This led to party splits and some measure of party decline. Meanwhile, other parties including the OEVP have suffered from an identity crisis adapting slowly to the rise of the FPOE through the 1990s making strategic changes in the most recent decade to try and confront the FPOE more directly.
机译:奥地利主流政党使整个西欧历史最悠久的大联盟政府永远存在。至少在过去的二十年中,力量的平衡已经牢固地转向了意识形态权。战后奥地利的政党体系缺乏可行的中央政党,也未能在其许多西欧邻国的重要规模上建立绿色政党。除了奥地利的主流社会民主党(Sozialdemokratische Partei OEslerreichs,SPO)以外,它没有工人党。在二十一世纪初,奥地利政党体系中缺乏在左翼政治上建立联盟的深度或选择的余地,为右翼联盟政府创造了独特的机会。然而,事实证明,奥地利的右翼政党似乎无法利用这种机会来巩固中央集权的权利。尽管在1999年与大联盟政府破裂,组成了奥地利人民党(OEsterreichische Volkspartei,OEVP)和奥地利自由党(Freiheitliche Partei OEsterreichs,FPOE)之间的联合政府,但OEVP-SPOE政府取得了相当大的胜利在2006年再次回归,并在2008年又一次大选中再次回归。本文通过考察奥地利政党从990-2012年之间的战略契合和互动,探讨了各派试图利用维持一个正确的权力集团的潜力所遇到的困难。它考虑了当事方在选举中以及在公职或反对派中的轨迹,研究了各个阶段所采用的背景和策略,尤其是随着命运的变化。它认为,奥地利的极右翼人士将政策目标与选票和随后的任期进行了交换,而与此同时,他们变得更加驯化并且在任职时容易被选民加入。这导致政党分裂和某种程度的政党衰落。同时,包括OEVP在内的其他各方也遭受了身份危机,直到1990年代,该危机慢慢适应了FPOE的兴起,在最近十年中进行了战略性调整,试图更直接地与FPOE对抗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号