首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011
【24h】

Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011

机译:动员民主:1989年与2011年比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The events of the Arab Spring and the colour revolutions in the former Soviet republics have added to growing interest in the role of collective social protest in facilitating regime change. In this book, Donatella della Porta compares the processes of regime change that unfolded in eastern Europe in 1989 with the more recent events of the Arab Spring in 2011. By bridging the fields of social movement studies and democratisation, the research sets out the aim of 'understanding what I define as democratisation from below, looking at protest waves that accompanied democratic reforms' (14). The connection between social movement studies and democratisation that underpins the work is clearly defined with the stated purpose in bringing the two together, to emphasise the nature of 'structure and agency within these transformative moments' (1). This leads to the development of a concept of 'eventful democratisation' as a framework for the analysis. Drawing on research into mechanisms within the field of social movement studies, cognitive, emotional and relational processes are singled out as being important in enabling and reinforcing action against non-democratic incumbents. These mechanisms clearly emphasise the role of individuals and groups in challenging the status quo, suggesting an ability to gauge the possibility of success, while also recognising the importance of less tangible drivers in sustaining potentially a high-risk opposition.
机译:阿拉伯之春的事件和前苏维埃共和国的颜色革命使人们对集体社会抗议在促进政权更替中的作用越来越感兴趣。在本书中,多纳泰拉·德拉·波塔(Donatella della Porta)将1989年东欧政权更迭的过程与2011年阿拉伯之春的最新事件进行了比较。该研究通过将社会运动研究与民主化的领域联系起来,提出了以下目标: “从下面了解我所定义的民主化,观察伴随民主改革的抗议浪潮”(14)。社会运动研究和民主化之间的联系是工作的基础,它的明确定义是将两者结合在一起的既定目的,以强调“在这些变革时刻内的结构和代理”的性质(1)。这导致了“事件民主化”的概念作为分析框架的发展。在对社会运动研究领域的机制进行研究的基础上,人们认识到了认知,情感和关系过程对于促进和加强针对非民主人士的行动很重要。这些机制清楚地强调了个人和团体在挑战现状中的作用,表明了一种衡量成功可能性的能力,同时也认识到不那么具体的推动者在维持潜在的高风险反对派中的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号