【24h】

The Limits of Electoral Reform

机译:选举改革的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shaun Bowler and Todd Donovan examine common features of electoral reform and look at why reform consistently falls short of the promised changes. They seek not only to understand elite self-interest in reform and public mobilization for support, but identify public perceptions about changes in the voting system. The book offers careful attention to national and regional reforms with case studies, including campaign finance reform and shifts to proportional representation (PR). The authors investigate the limits of reform 'by examining the logic used by proponents and opponents of various electoral reforms, and by assessing the role of the public in affecting how electoral rules change'. They take a comparative approach exploring national and regional reform in countries such as the UK, the USA, New Zealand and even Japan, but emphasize effects over time instead of a cross-sectional analysis. Drawing on a range of electoral data and qualitative research, Bowler and Donovan hope to offer a more realistic understanding of electoral reform and highlight why electoral rules are 'moving targets'.
机译:肖恩·鲍勒(Shaun Bowler)和托德·多诺万(Todd Donovan)研究了选举改革的共同特征,并探讨了为什么改革始终未能实现预期的变革。他们不仅试图了解精英人士对改革和公众动员的自我利益的支持,而且还寻求公众对投票制度变化的看法。该书通过案例研究特别关注了国家和地区的改革,包括竞选融资改革和向比例代表制(PR)的转变。作者“通过研究各种选举改革的支持者和反对者所使用的逻辑,并通过评估公众在影响选举规则变化中的作用来研究改革的局限性”。他们采用比较方法探索英国,美国,新西兰,甚至日本等国家的国家和地区改革,但着重强调随着时间的推移而不是进行截面分析。鲍勒(Bowler)和多诺万(Donovan)借助一系列选举数据和定性研究,希望对选举改革提供更现实的理解,并强调选举规则为何是“移动目标”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号