首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative economics >Regulation and taxation: A complementarity
【24h】

Regulation and taxation: A complementarity

机译:监管与税收:互补性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I show how quantity regulation can lower elasticities and thereby increase optimal tax rates. Such regulation imposes regulatory incentives for particular choice quantities. Their strength varies between zero (laissez faire) and infinite (command economy). In the latter case, regulation effectively eliminates any intensive behavioral responses to taxes; a previously distortionary tax becomes a lump sum. For intermediate regulation (where some deviation is feasible), intensive behavioral responses are still weaker than under zero regulation, and so quantity regulation reduces elasticities, thereby facilitating subsequent taxation. I apply this mechanism to labor supply and present correlational evidence for this complementarity: hours worked in high-regulation countries are compressed, and these countries tax labor at higher rates. Journal of Comparative Economics 38 (4) (2010) 381-394. Harvard University, Department of Economics, Littauer Center 200, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
机译:我展示了数量监管如何降低弹性,从而提高最佳税率。这种监管对特定选择数量施加监管激励。它们的强度在零(自由放任)和无限(命令经济)之间变化。在后一种情况下,监管有效地消除了对税收的任何强烈的行为反应;以前的畸形税变成了一笔总付。对于中间监管(可能存在一些偏差),密集的行为响应仍比零监管弱,因此数量监管会降低弹性,从而便于后续征税。我将这种机制应用于劳动力供给,并为这种互补性提供相关证据:在高度管制的国家中工作时间被压缩,这些国家以更高的税率对劳动力征税。比较经济学杂志38(4)(2010)381-394。哈佛大学经济系,利陶尔中心200,剑桥,MA 02138,美国。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号