...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >The Ethics of Hedging by Executives
【24h】

The Ethics of Hedging by Executives

机译:高管对冲的伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Executives of many publicly held firms agree to compensation packages that create immense exposure to their employer's stock. Corporate boards, aspiring to motivate executives to make value-maximizing decisions, often tie an executive's earnings to stock price performance through stock or option awards. However, this engenders a significant ethical dilemma for many executives who are uncomfortable with sizable, firm-specific risk and desire to reduce it through hedging activities. Recent research has shown that executive hedging has become more prevalent. In essence, managers are unwinding the acute economic incentive to act in the best interest of the owners. This appears to violate the spirit of the compensation contract and from a normative standpoint, is not how executives should act. In this article, we describe how some executives are acting in regard to this issue (descriptive ethics), how they should act (normative ethics) and how they can be helped to get from what they are doing, to what they should be doing (prescriptive ethics).
机译:许多上市公司的高管都同意采用补偿方案,这将给他们的雇主股票带来巨大的风险。公司董事会渴望激励高管人员做出价值最大化的决策,通常通过股票或期权奖励将高管人员的收入与股价表现挂钩。但是,这给许多高管带来了重大的道德困境,他们对巨大,特定于公司的风险感到不安,并希望通过对冲活动来降低风险。最近的研究表明,高管对冲变得越来越普遍。从本质上讲,经理们正在放松敏锐的经济动机,以为所有者的最大利益而行事。这似乎违反了薪酬合同的精神,从规范的角度来看,这不是高管应如何行事。在本文中,我们描述了一些高管人员在此问题上的行为方式(描述性道德规范),他们应如何行事(规范性道德规范)以及如何帮助他们从所做的事情中获得帮助,以达到他们应该做的事情(规范性伦理)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号