...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of architecture >Papered spaces: clerical practices, materialities, and spatial cultures of provincial governance in Bengal, Colonial India, 1820s-1860s
【24h】

Papered spaces: clerical practices, materialities, and spatial cultures of provincial governance in Bengal, Colonial India, 1820s-1860s

机译:1820年代,1820年代,1820年代,孟加拉州植物治理的文书实践,唯物主义和空间文化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

British colonial governance in India was built upon global technologies of writing produced through European mercantile colonialism; the extraction of the embodied Mughal administrative knowledge from a Persianette (or Tamil-proficient, as in Southern India) Indian clerical class, and its materialisation into official paper-based forms, as shown by Christopher Bayly; and a scribal-clerical 'habitus' as described by Bhavani Raman. This research focuses on the architecture, spaces and material culture associated with the paper-bureaucracy of the colonial government of Bengal that Jon Wilson calls one of the world's earliest modern states. It argues that this paper-/ writing-oriented habitus also mandated a chain of materialities and spatialities (paper-records, furniture, spaces, and architectures of colonial governance). Focusing on the colonial cutcherry (office), the nerve-centre of Bengal's zilla sadar (provincial administrative) towns, I analyse such 'papered spaces' as record rooms and clerical offices. The work is conceptualised around paper as a key agent of colonial governance, including the expanding spheres of its logic, which profoundly permeated the cutcherry's material-spatial culture and experiential 'lifeworld'. I also reflect on how colonial paper-practices intersected with other more immaterial and mobile circuits of knowledge and information spread over the town and country, and how such paper-governance was fed, for example, by spatial geographies of paper supply and printing. For the research, I combined extensive on-ground documentations of the material fabric of the buildings with archival research (governmental papers, period literature and art) in India, Bangladesh and Britain.
机译:印度的英国殖民治理是通过欧洲商品殖民主义制作的全球写作技术的建立;从Persianbete(或泰米尔熟练,如印度南部)印度文学阶层的实施中所体现的Mughal行政知识及其对基于官方纸质形式的实质性,如克里斯托弗·八卦所示;和Bhavani拉曼描述的血糖职员“习惯”。本研究侧重于与孟加拉殖民政府的纸张官僚主义相关的建筑,空间和材料文化,乔恩威尔森呼吁世界上最早的现代国家之一。它辩称,这篇论文/写入面向的习惯还强制了一系列物质和空间(纸张记录,家具,空间和殖民治理的架构)。专注于殖民地Cutcherry(办公室),孟加拉的Zilla Sadar(省级行政)城镇的神经中心,我分析了这些“纸张空间”作为记录室和文书办公室。这些作品围绕论文概念化为殖民治理的主要代理人,包括其逻辑的扩大领域,这深入渗透了Cutcherry的物质 - 空间文化和体验性“Lifeworld”。我还反思殖民地纸张习惯如何与其他更加非物质和移动电路相交的知识和移动电路,这些传播在城镇和国家的信息,以及例如,通过纸张供应和印刷的空间地理喂养这种情况治理。对于研究,我在印度,孟加拉国和英国的档案研究(政府论文,时期文学)的建筑物材料面料的广泛地面文件组合。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The journal of architecture》 |2020年第2期|111-137|共27页
  • 作者

    Tania Sengupta;

  • 作者单位

    The Bartlett School of Architecture University College London UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号