...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >WAR AND (LABOR) PEACE: HOW THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHANGED THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS AND ORGANIZED LABOR
【24h】

WAR AND (LABOR) PEACE: HOW THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHANGED THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS AND ORGANIZED LABOR

机译:战争和(和平)和平:第九电路如何改变服务提供者和有组织劳动者的聘用规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IN AIRLINE SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION V. LOS ANGELES WOR1JD AIRPORTS, the Ninth Circuit held that the City of Los Angeles, operator of the fourth largest airport in the world, may require airline service providers to enter into Labor Peace Agreements with organized labor representatives. Although the court correctly ruled that the trade association plaintiffs had standing and that the plaintiffs should have the opportunity to amend their complaint, the court erred in affirming the district courts decision to dismiss the complaint. Specifically, the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the city was acting as a market participant, rather than a regulator, when imposing contract conditions on the service providers. The proximate holding that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) does not preempt the city's action was premised on an error.
机译:在航空服务提供者协会V.洛杉矶世界机场,第九巡回法庭裁定,世界第四大机场的运营商洛杉矶市可能要求航空服务提供者与有组织的劳工代表签订《劳动和平协议》。尽管法院正确地裁定贸易协会的原告人有身分,并且原告人应有机会修改其申诉,但法院在确认地方法院驳回申诉的决定方面犯了错误。具体而言,第九巡回赛错误地认为,在向服务提供商施加合同条件时,该城市是作为市场参与者,而不是监管者。最接近的观点是,《国家劳动关系法》(NLRA)并未取代该城市的行动,这是基于一个错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号