...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of access services >Textbooks in academic libraries: Selection, circulation, and assessment
【24h】

Textbooks in academic libraries: Selection, circulation, and assessment

机译:高校图书馆的教科书:选择,发行和评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Perhaps, there is no another issue that divides the opinions of access services librarians more than the availability of required course textbooks in academic libraries. It is no secret that the cost of these materials skyrockets unabated. In fact, between 2002 and 2012 the cost of textbooks increased by 82%, while college tuition and fees continued to increase during the same period (p. ⅶ). The research also demonstrates that students in community colleges, nonselective universities, or from low-income households are most vulnerable to these pressures. These students are more likely to fail or drop out since they lack access to required course materials. On one side of the debate, access services librarians argue that placing course materials on reserve enables access, ensures student success, and results in happy students who complete their coursework and then ultimately graduate. On the other side are access services librarians who argue that the purchase of textbooks and course materials waste already limited library resources on materials that become obsolete quickly and that students should be responsible for acquiring. These librarians would also argue that by enabling faculty to place textbooks on reserve, it discourages them from seeking cheaper textbook options or exploring open educational resources. Perhaps the debate regarding textbooks is so fierce because both camps have valid points.
机译:也许,除了高校图书馆所需的课程教科书之外,没有其他问题可以使访问服务图书馆员的意见分歧更大。这些材料的价格飞速增长,这已不是秘密。实际上,在2002年至2012年期间,教科书的成本增加了82%,而同期的大学学杂费继续增加(第。页)。该研究还表明,社区学院,非选择性大学或低收入家庭的学生最容易受到这些压力的影响。这些学生更容易失败或辍学,因为他们无法获得所需的课程材料。在辩论的一方面,无障碍服务图书馆员争辩说,将课程资料保留下来即可访问,确保学生成功,并导致高兴的学生完成课程并最终毕业。另一面是无障碍服务图书馆员,他们认为购买教科书和课程材料浪费了已经很有限的图书馆资源,而这些资源很快就过时了,应该由学生来负责。这些图书馆员还会争辩说,通过使教师能够储备教科书,这会阻止他们寻求便宜的教科书选择或探索开放的教育资源。也许关于教科书的辩论如此激烈,因为两个阵营都有正确的观点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of access services》 |2018年第3期|75-76|共2页
  • 作者

    Michael J. Krasulski;

  • 作者单位

    Department Chair and Assistant Professor, Library/Access Services Librarian, Community College of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号