首页> 外文期刊>Jewish History >Freedom of Education and Dutch Jewish Schools in the Mid-Nineteenth Century
【24h】

Freedom of Education and Dutch Jewish Schools in the Mid-Nineteenth Century

机译:19世纪中叶的教育自由与荷兰犹太学校

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the Netherlands of the mid-nineteenth century a political debate took place concerning the desirability of denominational schools. Roman-Catholics and Protestants opposed the current law of 1806, which defined the new state subsidized Dutch primary schools as denominationally neutral, but with an overall Christian identity. They wanted their own schools, in which they could teach doctrine. The new constitution of 1848 and its implementation in the Education Act of 1857 met their demands by allowing freedom of education for all denominations. Quite different was the situation of the Jews. Contrary to other denominations, Jews were supported to set up their own schools, in which doctrine was taught, even after 1817. For them, the freedom of education made a constitutional principle in 1848 meant the freedom to send their children to regular public schools. The result was the disappearance of almost all of the forty-eight authorised Jewish primary schools. In this paper we explore the motives behind these Jewish actions and their meaning in the context of political and social debates that took place in the mid-nineteenth century, motives, which were directly related to matters of emancipation, acculturation, and their desired – or unwanted – affects.
机译:在19世纪中叶的荷兰,就宗派学校的可取性进行了政治辩论。罗马天主教徒和新教徒反对1806年的现行法律,该法律将新州补贴的荷兰小学定义为宗派中立,但总体上具有基督教身份。他们想要自己的学校,可以在那里教教义。 1848年的新宪法及其在1857年的《教育法》中的实施通过允许所有教派的教育自由来满足他们的要求。犹太人的处境完全不同。与其他教派相反,犹太人得到支持成立自己的学校,甚至在1817年之后也开始教授学说。对他们而言,教育自由于1848年成为宪法原则,这意味着将子女送往正规公立学校的自由。结果是几乎所有48所授权的犹太小学都消失了。在本文中,我们探讨了这些犹太人行为背后的动机及其在19世纪中叶发生的政治和社会辩论的背景下的意义,这些动机与解放,适应和他们的期望直接相关,或者不想要的-影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号