...
首页> 外文期刊>International Studies in Sociology of Education >Public universities and the neoliberal common sense: seven iconoclastic theses
【24h】

Public universities and the neoliberal common sense: seven iconoclastic theses

机译:公立大学与新自由主义常识:七个破例论文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Neoliberalism has utterly failed as a viable model of economic development, yet the politics of culture associated with neoliberalism is still in force, becoming the new common sense shaping the role of government and education. This ‘common sense’ has become an ideology playing a major role in constructing hegemony as moral and intellectual leadership in contemporary societies. Neoliberal globalisation, predicated on the dominance of the market over the state and on deregulatory models of governance, has deeply affected the university in the context of ‘academic capitalism’. The resulting reforms, rationalised as advancing international competitiveness, have affected public universities in four primary areas: efficiency and accountability, accreditation and universalisation, international competitiveness and privatisation. There is also growing resistance to globalisation as top-down-imposed reforms reflected in the public debates about schooling reform, curriculum and instruction, teacher training and school governance. Many question whether neoliberal reforms attempt to limit the effectiveness of universities as sites of contestation of the national and global order and thus undermine the broader goals of education. Neoliberal reforms have limited access and opportunity along class and racial lines, including limiting access to higher education through the imposition of higher tuition and reduced government support to institutions and individuals.View full textDownload full textKeywordsneoliberal common sense, neoliberal globalization, higher education, Critical Theory, political sociology of educationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2011.616340
机译:新自由主义作为经济发展的可行模式彻底失败了,但是与新自由主义有关的文化政治仍然有效,成为塑造政府和教育角色的新常识。这种“常识”已成为一种意识形态,在建设霸权作为当代社会的道德和智力领导者方面发挥着重要作用。新自由主义的全球化以市场在国家上的支配地位和放松管制的治理模式为基础,在“学术资本主义”的背景下深刻地影响了大学。随之而来的改革被合理化为提高国际竞争力,已经对公立大学的四个主要领域产生了影响:效率和责任制,认证和普及,国际竞争力和私有化。由于自上而下进行的改革反映在关于学校改革,课程和教学,教师培训和学校治理的公开辩论中,因此对全球化的抵抗力也越来越强。许多人质疑新自由主义的改革是否试图限制大学作为竞争国家和全球秩序的场所的效力,从而损害更广泛的教育目标。新自由主义的改革在阶级和种族方面限制了获得机会的机会,包括通过施加更高的学费限制了高等教育的获得,并减少了政府对机构和个人的支持。 ,教育的政治社会学相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2011.616340

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号