...
首页> 外文期刊>International Studies in Sociology of Education >‘Canaries in the coal mine’: the reframing of biculturalism and non-Māori participation in Māori language learning
【24h】

‘Canaries in the coal mine’: the reframing of biculturalism and non-Māori participation in Māori language learning

机译:“煤矿里的金丝雀”:双重文化主义的改组和非毛利人参与毛利人语言学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Māori language education policy documents reflect an underlying ambivalence about the desired outcomes for non-Māori learners participating in ‘as-a-subject’ Māori language learning. The view of the Māori language as a national language may be in the process of being replaced by a view that identifies the language primarily as a cultural taonga (treasured possession) belonging to those of Māori ethnicity in the interests of an emergent elite. This is a process that characterises the ‘reframing of biculturalism’. Language, as a communally shared good, serves an important boundary marking function and can be employed as a demarcating feature of identity. Viewed in this way, the Māori language contributes to strengthening a Māori ethnic identity, which in turn secures access to group rights. These group rights were established when Māori tribes were reconstituted as economic corporations or neotribes in political partnership with the government in the 1980s. The increasing exclusion of non-Māori from the Māori language may result in their rejection of biculturalism.View full textDownload full textKeywordsbiculturalism, Māori language education, ethnic identityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2011.616345
机译:毛利人语言教育政策文件反映了参与“按主题”毛利人语言学习的非毛利人学习者对预期结果的潜在矛盾。毛利人的语言作为一种民族语言的观点可能正在被一种观点所取代,该观点认为该语言主要是出于紧急情况而属于毛利人的文化taonga(受保护的财产)精英。这是表征“双重文化主义重新诠释”的过程。语言作为一种公共共享的物品,具有重要的边界标记功能,可以用作标识的划分特征。从这种角度来看,毛利人的语言有助于增强毛利人的族裔身份,从而确保获得群体权利。这些群体权利是在1980年代通过与政府建立政治伙伴关系将毛利人部落重组为经济公司或新部落时建立的。非毛利人从毛利人语言中被越来越多的排斥可能会导致他们拒绝双重文化主义。查看全文下载全文关键字双文化主义,毛利人语言教育,种族身份services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2011.616345

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号