...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of operations research and information systems >Order Admission and Optimal Pricing for Regular Jobs and Big Deals at a Service Company
【24h】

Order Admission and Optimal Pricing for Regular Jobs and Big Deals at a Service Company

机译:服务公司的常规工作和大宗交易的订单准入和最佳定价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper studies optimal pricing and demand management policies for a firm that faces two streams of order types: one is composed of recurring regular jobs with pre-determined prices (exogenous prices) and the other involves big deals that require pricing proposals (endogenous prices). The probability to secure the big deals diminishes with the quoted price. The authors develop and compare optimization models for different demand management settings. Specifically, we consider two distinct strategies: a pure strategy in which the firm commits to bid for deals only and a mixed strategy where the firm switches its allocation of capacity between regular jobs and deals. The authors compare optimal pricing strategies under two demand management strategies that differ in how they allocate capacity across regular jobs and deals, and order acceptance policies that they adopt. The authors observe that the differences between two strategies in terms of pricing and average gain are in accord. Under any given set of systems parameters, one of the strategies leads to both higher prices and average gains. Typically, the preferable strategy depends on the exogenous price of regular orders and the price sensitivity of the deals. The authors conclude that the threshold values for these two parameters are determined primarily by the demand rate of the deals and the service rate of the standard jobs.
机译:本文研究了面对两种订单类型的公司的最优定价和需求管理策略:一种是由具有预定价格(外生价格)的周期性常规工作组成,另一种涉及需要定价建议(内生价格)的大交易。 。取得大宗交易的可能性随报价而降低。作者开发并比较了针对不同需求管理设置的优化模型。具体来说,我们考虑两种截然不同的策略:纯粹的策略(其中公司承诺仅竞标交易)和混合策略(公司在正常工作和交易之间切换其能力分配)。作者比较了两种需求管理策略下的最优定价策略,这两种策略的区别在于它们如何分配正常工作和交易的能力以及采用的订单接受策略。作者观察到,两种策略在定价和平均收益方面的差异是一致的。在任何给定的系统参数集下,其中一种策略会导致更高的价格和平均收益。通常,首选策略取决于常规订单的外部价格和交易的价格敏感性。作者得出结论,这两个参数的阈值主要取决于交易的需求率和标准职位的服务率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号