...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of geotechnical engineering >Laboratory testing and numerical modelling on bearing capacity of geotextile-reinforced granular soils
【24h】

Laboratory testing and numerical modelling on bearing capacity of geotextile-reinforced granular soils

机译:土工织物加筋颗粒土承载力的室内试验和数值模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper summarises the details of an experimental work and numerical simulation on the bearing capacity of geotextile-reinforced granular soils with different fine grain contents (10 and 15%) which are mostly used in pavement design. The effects of position and number of geotextile layer(s) on the bearing capacity of reinforced specimens were investigated. The standard laboratory California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test was conducted to investigate the load-penetration behaviour of the unreinforced granular soils as well as reinforced ones with nonwoven geotextile layer(s). The reinforcements have been placed in samples in seven different scenarios (one, two and/or three layers of reinforcement in the bottom, middle and/or top compacted soil layers). The results indicated an increase in bearing capacity for most of the scenarios due to placing the geotextile layer(s); however, it was seen that increasing the number of reinforcement layers will not necessarily increase the reinforced soil mass bearing capacity. Also it was found that the efficiency of placing the reinforcement layers in order to increase the bearing capacity is higher for the soil mass with higher fine content in compare to the soil mass with lower fine content; even in some scenarios for the soil with lower fine content, the geotextile would decrease the bearing in compare to the unreinforced sample. Besides this laboratory testing, Finite Element (FE) software was used to simulate the CBR tests. The FE analysis results showed that the ratio of predicted to measured CBR value is varied between the range of 1.06-1.20 for the soil with lower fine content and 0.86-1.086 for the soil with higher fine content. After the FE model was validated, it was tried by changing the properties of the nonwoven geotextile with a woven one in software to make a comparison between two reinforcement types.
机译:本文总结了主要用于路面设计的不同细粒含量(分别为10%和15%)的土工织物加筋的粒状土的承载力的试验工作和数值模拟的细节。研究了土工布层的位置和数量对钢筋试样承载力的影响。进行了标准实验室加利福尼亚承载比(CBR)测试,以研究未增强的粒状土以及具有非织造土工布层的增强土的荷载穿透性能。将增强材料放置在七个不同场景的样本中(在底部,中间和/或顶部压实的土壤层中一层,两层和/或三层增强材料)。结果表明,在大多数情况下,由于放置了土工织物层,承载力有所增加;然而,可以看出,增加加固层的数量并不一定会增加加固土的承载能力。还发现与细粉含量较低的土体相比,细粉含量较高的土体布置增强层以增加承载力的效率更高。即使在某些情况下,对于细含量较低的土壤,土工布也会比未增强的样品降低承重。除此实验室测试外,还使用有限元(FE)软件来模拟CBR测试。有限元分析结果表明,细粉含量较低的土壤的预测CBR值与测得的CBR值之比在1.06-1.20范围内,而细粉含量较高的土壤则为0.86-1.086。验证有限元模型后,通过在软件中使用编织的非织造土工布的性能进行更改来进行比较,以进行两种增强类型的比较,从而进行了尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号