...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of electronic security and digital forensics >Comparison analysis of electricity theft detection methods for advanced metering infrastructure in smart grid
【24h】

Comparison analysis of electricity theft detection methods for advanced metering infrastructure in smart grid

机译:智能电网中先进计量基础设施的窃电检测方法比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While smart grid technologies are deployed to help achieve improved grid reliability and efficiency, energy companies are vulnerable to cyber-attacks leading to billions of dollars loss. The selection of an appropriate classification method for the electricity theft detection relies on operational requirements and resource constraints in real scenarios. Since unsupervised methods have high error rates, we employ a semi-supervised anomaly detection method [the principal component analysis (PCA)] technique for the electricity theft detection. PCA is compared with the peer-to-peer (P2P) method based on linear equations. The P2P method assumes known particular electricity theft patterns and in the absence of which, the P2P method detection system results in 100% false alarm. While PCA does not require any prior assumptions about the pattern of the electricity theft, 4% false alarm rate is observed. Our analysis shows an average of 45% improvement in the detection accuracy rate in comparison with the P2P method.
机译:在部署智能电网技术以帮助提高电网可靠性和效率的同时,能源公司很容易受到网络攻击,导致数十亿美元的损失。为偷电检测选择合适的分类方法取决于实际情况下的操作要求和资源限制。由于无监督方法具有较高的错误率,因此我们采用半监督异常检测方法[主成分分析(PCA)]技术进行电盗窃检测。将PCA与基于线性方程的对等(P2P)方法进行比较。 P2P方法采用已知的特定电盗模式,在没有这种模式的情况下,P2P方法检测系统会导致100%错误警报。尽管PCA不需要任何有关电盗窃行为的事先假设,但观察到4%的误报率。我们的分析显示,与P2P方法相比,检测准确率平均提高了45%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号