...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on >Two-dimensional blood velocity estimation with ultrasound: speckle tracking versus crossed-beam vector doppler based on flow simulations in a carotid bifurcation model
【24h】

Two-dimensional blood velocity estimation with ultrasound: speckle tracking versus crossed-beam vector doppler based on flow simulations in a carotid bifurcation model

机译:超声二维血流速度估计:基于颈动脉分叉模型中血流模拟的斑点跟踪与交叉波束矢量多普勒

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Detailed imaging of complex blood flow may improve early diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. In clinical practice, non-invasive flow imaging has been limited to one-dimensional Doppler techniques. Searching for multi-dimensional estimators, research has given attention to speckle tracking (ST) and vector Doppler (VD). However, these techniques have yet to be validated for complex flow patterns as may arise in diseased arteries. In this work, the properties of ST and crossed-beam VD are compared with a ground truth for clinically relevant flow using an ultrasonic simulation environment coupled with the output from computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The statistical properties (n = 80) of ST and VD were first evaluated for stationary flow in a tube for varying vessel positions and angles, and for varying noise levels. The parameter study demonstrated VD to be a more robust axial velocity estimator, and similar results were obtained overall for the lateral velocity component. As an example, the relative standard deviation was 15% and 8% for ST compared with 3% and 10% for VD, for the axial and lateral velocity component, respectively. Further, performance was evaluated for pulsatile flow conditions in a stenosed carotid bifurcation model. A linear regression analysis showed that both methods overall had a good agreement to the CFD reference, however VD suffered from more spurious artifacts and was severely hampered by aliasing in parts of the cardiac cycle. ST was less accurate in estimating the axial component, but prevailed in estimating velocities well beyond the Nyquist range. Based on our simulations, both methods may be used to image complex flow behavior in the carotid bifurcation, however, considering also the scanning limitations of VD, ST may provide a more consistent and practical approach. Future work will entail in vitro and in vivo validation of these results.
机译:复杂血流的详细成像可能会改善心血管疾病的早期诊断。在临床实践中,无创血流成像技术仅限于一维多普勒技术。在寻找多维估计量时,研究集中在散斑跟踪(ST)和矢量多普勒(VD)上。然而,这些技术尚未针对患病动脉中可能出现的复杂血流模式进行验证。在这项工作中,使用超声模拟环境以及计算流体力学(CFD)的输出,将ST和横梁VD的特性与临床相关流量的地面真实情况进行比较。首先评估ST和VD的统计特性(n = 80),以了解在不同的容器位置和角度以及变化的噪声水平下管中的固定流量。参数研究表明,VD是一种更可靠的轴向速度估计器,并且横向速度分量总体上获得了相似的结果。例如,轴向和横向速度分量的相对标准偏差ST分别为15%和8%,而VD分别为3%和10%。此外,在狭窄的颈动脉分叉模型中评估了脉动血流条件的性能。线性回归分析表明,两种方法总体上都与CFD参考值吻合良好,但是VD遭受了更多的伪影,并且由于心动周期的部分混叠而严重受阻。 ST在估算轴向分量方面不太准确,但在估算远远超出Nyquist范围的速度时占优势。基于我们的模拟,这两种方法都可以用于对颈动脉分叉处的复杂流动行为进行成像,但是,考虑到VD的扫描局限性,ST可以提供一种更一致和实用的方法。未来的工作将需要对这些结果进行体外和体内验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号