...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE personal communications >A comparative evaluation of DECT, PACS, and PHS standards for wireless local loop applications
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of DECT, PACS, and PHS standards for wireless local loop applications

机译:DECT,PACS和PHS标准在无线本地环路应用中的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In a comparative analysis the performance and capacity of DECT, PACS, and PHS for WLL applications have been investigated. This article reports the results of both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The qualitative evaluation consists of a detailed comparison of the parameters of each standard and their relevance in WLL applications. In the quantitative analysis detailed simulations have been performed covering diversified sets of conditions. The results of both types of analysis are presented. A major conclusion is that all three standards provide satisfactory performance for WLL applications. For low-traffic environments PACS, which can employ larger cells, performs better than the other two standards. In suburban areas where, in addition to coverage, capacity is an issue, DECT has better performance. For high-traffic-density urban areas with great capacity requirements all three standards have good performance.
机译:在比较分析中,已经研究了DECT,PACS和PHS在WLL应用中的性能和容量。本文报告了定性和定量分析的结果。定性评估包括每个标准参数的详细比较及其在WLL应用中的相关性。在定量分析中,已经进行了涵盖多种条件的详细模拟。给出了两种分析的结果。一个主要结论是,所有三个标准都为WLL应用程序提供了令人满意的性能。对于低流量环境,PACS可以使用更大的单元,其性能优于其他两个标准。在除了覆盖范围之外还成为容量问题的郊区,DECT的性能更好。对于交通需求量大的高交通密度城市地区,这三个标准均具有良好的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号