A tenant evicted based on the Residential Drug-Related Evictions Act (RDEA) of the District of Columbia code was entitled to a new trial because of an intervening decision on the definition of a drug haven, ruled the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. (Ball v. Arthur Winn General Partnership, No. 05-CV-259, 2005 WL 2008139 (D.C.), July 20, 2006).
展开▼
机译:哥伦比亚特区上诉法院裁定,根据哥伦比亚特区法典的《与居民有关的药物驱逐法》(RDEA)被驱逐的租户有权进行新的审判,这是因为对毒品避难所的定义作出了干预决定。 (Ball v.Arthur Winn General Partnership,No.05-CV-259,2005 WL 2008139(D.C.),2006年7月20日)。
展开▼