...
首页> 外文期刊>Government information quarterly >'Cyber Gurus': A rhetorical analysis of the language of cybersecurity specialists and the implications for security policy and critical infrastructure protection
【24h】

'Cyber Gurus': A rhetorical analysis of the language of cybersecurity specialists and the implications for security policy and critical infrastructure protection

机译:“ Cyber​​ Gurus”:对网络安全专家的语言的修辞分析,以及对安全策略和关键基础设施保护的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper draws on the psychology of risk and "management guru" literature (Huczynski, 2006) to examine how cybersecurity risks are constructed and communicated by cybersecurity specialists. We conduct a rhetorical analysis of ten recent cybersecurity publications ranging from popular media to academic and technical articles. We find most cybersecurity specialists in the popular domain use management guru techniques and manipulate common cognitive limitations in order to over-dramatize and over-simplify cybersecurity risks to critical infrastructure (CI). We argue there is a role for government: to collect, validate and disseminate more data among owners and operators of CI; to adopt institutional arrangements with an eye to moderating exaggerated claims; to reframe the debate as one of trade-offs between threats and opportunities as opposed to one of survival; and, finally, to encourage education programs in order to stimulate a more informed debate over the longer term. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文利用风险心理学和“管理大师”文献(Huczynski,2006)来研究网络安全专家是如何构建和传达网络安全风险的。我们对最近十种网络安全出版物进行了夸夸其谈的分析,从流行媒体到学术和技术文章。我们发现,流行领域中的大多数网络安全专家都使用管理大师技术并操纵常见的认知限制,以过度描述和过分简化关键基础架构(CI)的网络安全风险。我们认为政府有一个作用:在CI的所有者和运营商之间收集,验证和传播更多数据;采取制度安排,以缓和夸大的主张;将辩论重新构想为威胁与机遇之间的权衡之一,而不是生存之道;最后,鼓励开展教育计划,以期从长远来看引发更明智的辩论。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号