...
首页> 外文期刊>Government information quarterly >How responsive are government agencies when contacted by email? Findings from a longitudinal study in Australia and New Zealand
【24h】

How responsive are government agencies when contacted by email? Findings from a longitudinal study in Australia and New Zealand

机译:通过电子邮件联系政府机构时反应如何?澳大利亚和新西兰的纵向研究结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reports on findings from a longitudinal study of e-government responsiveness. Of course, a key expectation is that e-government will improve responsiveness. The article presents data collected at three intervals from 2006 to 2013 in a simple exercise that involved emailing government agencies in Australia and New Zealand asking for basic information. A total of 790 Australian and 115 New Zealand agencies were ranked according to whether they responded to the email and, if so, the quality of the response. Performances over time were relatively consistent in both countries, but highlighted some concerns for policy makers, especially in Australia around the responsiveness of their state and federal agencies. In a perhaps worrying trend, the quality of responses declined amongst both Australian and New Zealand local government agencies. This study offers an important lens on public sector performance, raising questions of responsiveness that every taxpayer whose money is being invested in e-government services ought to be concerned about. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
机译:本文报告了对电子政务响应能力的纵向研究的发现。当然,关键的期望是电子政务将改善响应能力。本文通过一个简单的练习介绍了从2006年到2013年的三个时间间隔收集的数据,该过程涉及通过电子邮件向澳大利亚和新西兰的政府机构发送电子邮件,要求提供基本信息。根据他们是否回复电子邮件以及回复的质量,对总共790个澳大利亚和115个新西兰机构进行了排名。随着时间的推移,这两个国家的绩效相对稳定,但突显了决策者的一些担忧,尤其是在澳大利亚,其州和联邦机构的反应能力。在一个令人担忧的趋势中,澳大利亚和新西兰地方政府机构的回应质量都下降了。这项研究为公共部门的绩效提供了重要的视角,引发了人们的反应性问题,即每个将钱投入到电子政务服务中的纳税人都应予以关注。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号