首页> 外文期刊>Global public health >Understanding the capacity of community-based groups to mobilise and engage in social action for health: Results from Avahan
【24h】

Understanding the capacity of community-based groups to mobilise and engage in social action for health: Results from Avahan

机译:了解社区群体的能力,动员和参与健康的社会行动:Avahan的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Community mobilisation improves outcomes from HIV to maternal and child health. Yet, little health research has explored why some community groups are better able to mobilise than others. We address this gap by considering the case of Avahan, the India AIDS Initiative, which sought to foster community mobilisation, including the creation of community-based groups serving men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSWs), and injection drug users (IDUs). Using quantitative and qualitative data collected from 58 community-based groups from 2009-2012 across six Indian states, we analyse variation in groups' action on behalf of their members. Based on a mixed effects logistic regression, we find that older groups and those with bank accounts, crisis committees, or strategic relationships were most likely to take action on behalf of members by demanding rights or confronting gatekeepers and opinion leaders. Analysis of qualitative data reveals the types of action organisations took on behalf of members (mediation, removal of community members from harm, and advocacy), but also that sometimes organisations refused to take action, or community members declined their assistance. These findings indicate that organisations formalising, creating structures for social action, and building networks are important strategies to foster community mobilisation.
机译:社区动员改善了艾滋病毒对妇幼保健的结果。然而,小型健康研究探索了为什么有些社区团体比其他社区群体更能动力。我们通过考虑Avahan的案例来解决这一差距,该艾滋病倡议试图促进社区动员,包括建立社区群体为与男人(MSM),女性性工作者(FSW)发生性关系的人,以及注射药物(IDU)。使用从2009 - 2012年的58个以58个社区群体收集的定量和定性数据,我们在六个印度国家分析了代表其成员的群体行动的变化。基于混合效应回归,我们发现较旧的团体和与银行账户,危机委员会或战略关系的人最有可能通过苛刻的权利或面对守门人和意见领导者代表会员采取行动。定性数据的分析显示,行动组织的类型代表成员(调解,驳回危害的社区成员以及宣传),而且有时组织拒绝采取行动,或社区成员拒绝了他们的援助。这些调查结果表明,组织正式化,创造社会行动结构,建设网络是促进社区动员的重要策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号