...
首页> 外文期刊>Financial history review >Public or private interests? The investment behaviour of public officials in Antwerp during the early modern period
【24h】

Public or private interests? The investment behaviour of public officials in Antwerp during the early modern period

机译:公共利益还是私人利益?近代安特卫普公职人员的投资行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Indebted cities were a widespread phenomenon during the Ancien Regime. However, some found ways to innovate the management of their municipal debt, whilst others fell prey to over-indebtedness or default. In this article we have left the success stories aside and focused on the latter. Using early modem Antwerp as a case study, we have disentangled the underlying mechanisms that ultimately lead to over-indebtedness and (in some cases) default. Whilst the economic climate and the relationship between city and state have been rightly identified as major factors in the previous literature, our contribution brings another element to the table, namely, the inflexibility of long-established rent arrangements and the entanglement between the ruling elite and the rentiers. We show that there was a strong overlap between both groups, which had a huge impact on the financial policy of cities during the early modern period.
机译:在古代政权时期,负债累累的城市是一种普遍现象。但是,有些人找到了创新方法来管理其市政债务,而另一些人则成为过度负债或违约的牺牲品。在本文中,我们将成功案例放在一边,而仅关注后者。使用早期的现代安特卫普作为案例研究,我们弄清了最终导致过度负债和(在某些情况下)违约的潜在机制。尽管在先前的文献中正确地将经济气候和城市与国家之间的关系确定为主要因素,但我们的贡献为该表带来了另一个因素,即长期存在的租金安排的不灵活性以及统治精英与政府之间的纠缠。食人族。我们表明,这两个群体之间有很强的重叠性,这对近代早期城市的金融政策产生了巨大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号