...
首页> 外文期刊>Financial history review >Big Bang in the City of London: an intentional revolution or an accident?
【24h】

Big Bang in the City of London: an intentional revolution or an accident?

机译:伦敦市的大爆炸:故意革命还是意外?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In July 1983 an agreement was reached between the British government and the London Stock Exchange that was to transform the London securities market in October 1986. The result was a revolution that extended all the way from the design of the market to those permitted access to the governance of those who traded. Given the speed of change, it was termed 'Big Bang' by contemporaries. As the scale of the transformation became known, politicians were quick to claim credit for what had been achieved. Subsequently, Big Bang has been regarded as one of the crowning achievements of the Conservative government led by Mrs Thatcher, providing the foundation for the City of London's re-emergence as the leading international financial centre. However, only now is evidence emerging of the intentions of those involved at the time rather than as expressed in the light of hindsight, which casts doubt on what they were seeking to achieve, whether viewed from the perspective of either the politicians or those in charge of the Stock Exchange. Instead, the longer-term pressure for change in the London securities market, the chain reaction caused by abolition of fixed-commission charges, and the proactive role of the Bank of England appear to be of greater significance. What an examination of the process leading up to Big Bang in 1986 reveals is the complexity of political decision involving the financial sector and the danger of unforeseen consequences. One small change can create a tipping point if the result is to remove an essential element within a complex system.
机译:1983年7月,英国政府与伦敦证券交易所达成了一项协议,该协议将改变1986年10月的伦敦证券市场。其结果是一场革命,从市场设计一直扩展到允许进入伦敦市场的人。交易者的治理。鉴于变化的速度,它被当代人称为“大爆炸”。随着变革规模的扩大,政客们很快就对所取得的成就表示赞赏。随后,大爆炸被认为是撒切尔夫人领导的保守党政府的最高成就之一,为伦敦市重新崛起为国际领先的金融中心奠定了基础。但是,直到现在,才有证据表明当时所涉人员的意图,而不是根据事后的见解表达出来的,这使人们怀疑他们正在寻求实现的目标,无论是从政客还是从负责人的角度来看证券交易所。相反,伦敦证券市场的长期压力,取消固定佣金所引起的连锁反应以及英格兰银行的积极作用似乎具有更大的意义。对导致1986年大爆炸的过程进行的审查揭示了涉及金融部门的政治决策的复杂性以及不可预见的后果的危险。如果结果是删除复杂系统中的必要元素,那么一个小的更改就会产生临界点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号