...
首页> 外文期刊>ERA Forum >The draft principles of European unjustified enrichment law prepared by the study group on a European civil code: A comment
【24h】

The draft principles of European unjustified enrichment law prepared by the study group on a European civil code: A comment

机译:研究组根据欧洲民法典制定的欧洲不正当浓缩法原则草案:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The PEL Unj. Enrich, is a fascinating project, and Professor von Bar and his working group deserve our admiration and unqualified respect. However, declaring this draft to be the "final version" and placing it on the Study Group‘s website under this heading13 seems to be somewhat premature. The analysis of eight paradigm situations has revealed that the Principles as they stand today do not always provide for convincing solutions and sometimes even lead to clearly unacceptable results. Some of the remaining shortcomings may be cured with a single stroke of the pen, whereas others call for a more fundamental revision of the draft. Generally speaking, their highly complex structure, their technicality and the remoteness of their patterns from the patterns of the real world will make it difficult for the Principles to be accepted as part of European private law.
机译:PEL Unj。 Enrich是一个令人着迷的项目,von Bar教授及其工作组值得我们钦佩和无与伦比的尊重。但是,宣布此草案为“最终版本”并将其放在研究组网站上的标题下似乎有点为时过早。对八种范例情况的分析表明,当今的原则并不总是提供令人信服的解决方案,有时甚至会导致明显不可接受的结果。剩下的一些缺陷可以通过笔的一击就可以解决,而其他缺陷则需要对草案进行更根本的修改。一般而言,它们的高度复杂的结构,其技术性以及它们的模式与现实世界的模式的距离较远,将使这些原则难以被接受为欧洲私法的一部分。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ERA Forum》 |2006年第2期|244-264|共21页
  • 作者

    Christiane C. Wendehorst;

  • 作者单位

    University of Göttingen Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号