...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology >Reversing membrane wetting in membrane distillation: comparing dryout to backwashing with pressurized air
【24h】

Reversing membrane wetting in membrane distillation: comparing dryout to backwashing with pressurized air

机译:逆向膜蒸馏中的膜润湿:比较干燥和加压空气的反冲洗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The critical failure mode for membrane distillation (MD) desalination is wetting through the pores of the hydrophobic membrane, which allows the saline solution to leak through and contaminate the permeate. The standard practice for reversing membrane wetting is to dry out the membrane for several hours before resuming the desalination process. An alternative method for mitigating MD membrane wetting is examined in this study, wherein pressurized air is pushed through the membrane from the permeate side for several seconds, forcing trapped water out before it can evaporate. To compare the wetting reversal methods, the liquid entry pressure (LEP) was surpassed with saline water at varied salinity. Then, either a 24+ hour dryout, a 10 second pressurized air treatment, or both were applied, followed by remeasuring the LEP. Pressurized air backwashing restored the LEP to 75% of the original value for lower salinity feeds. The backwashing method is hypothesized to achieve this superior result because it removes saline solution from the membrane without separating water and salts by vaporization, whereas the dryout method causes seawater within the membrane to evaporate, leaving crystalline solutes trapped within the membrane. Such trapped particles may act as a path for rewetting, and also impair permeate flux and system energy efficiency. For all three methods, membranes tested with higher salinity water had lower LEP restoration irrespective of the restoration technique used. A method for testing LEP with more accuracy was also developed, using stepwise pressure increases. SEM images showed that the restoration methods did not alter the membranes themselves, although there remains a possibility that the air backwashing can cause superficial tears.
机译:膜蒸馏(MD)脱盐的关键失效模式是通过疏水膜的孔润湿,这会使盐溶液泄漏并污染渗透液。扭转膜润湿的标准做法是在恢复脱盐过程之前将膜干燥几个小时。在这项研究中,研究了另一种减轻MD膜湿润的方法,其中将加压空气从渗透物侧推过膜几秒钟,迫使残留的水蒸发掉。为了比较润湿逆转方法,在不同盐度下,盐水都超过了液体入口压力(LEP)。然后,进行24小时以上的干透,10秒的加压空气处理或两者都进行,然后重新测量LEP。加压空气反冲洗可将LEP恢复至原始盐度值的75%(盐度较低的饲料)。假设使用反洗方法可达到这一优异效果,因为它可以从膜中除去盐溶液而不会通过蒸发分离出水和盐,而干燥方法会使膜内的海水蒸发,从而将结晶溶质截留在膜内。此类捕获的颗粒可能充当重新润湿的路径,并且还会削弱渗透通量和系统能效。对于这三种方法,无论采用何种修复技术,用高盐度水测试的膜的LEP修复率均较低。还开发了一种使用逐步压力增加来更精确地测试LEP的方法。 SEM图像显示,尽管空气反冲洗可能会引起表面撕裂,但修复方法并未改变膜本身。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    MIT, Rohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Lab, Dept Mech Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA;

    MIT, Dept Chem Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA;

    MIT, Rohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Lab, Dept Mech Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA;

    Masdar Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, Inst Ctr Water & Environm iWATER, POB 54224, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates;

    Masdar Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, Inst Ctr Water & Environm iWATER, POB 54224, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates;

    MIT, Dept Chem Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA;

    MIT, Rohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Lab, Dept Mech Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号