...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Development Economics >Getting incentives right?: a comparative analysis of policy instruments for livestock waste pollution abatement in Yucatan, Mexico
【24h】

Getting incentives right?: a comparative analysis of policy instruments for livestock waste pollution abatement in Yucatan, Mexico

机译:获得激励措施正确吗?:墨西哥尤卡坦州减少牲畜废物污染的政策工具的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Building on the extensive theoretical and empirical work regarding the cost-minimizing properties of economic instruments, this article describes and analyses the Mexican legislation relevant to the treatment/disposal of pig slurry in the state of Yucatan. Using a linear programming model to determine the optimal level of pig production and abatement processes simultaneously, different policy instruments and scenarios are compared. Serious shortcomings associated with the recently introduced command-and-control (CAC) legislation, which establishes concentration-based standards for discharges, are identified. It is shown that it will be extremely difficult and expensive to comply with (cost: US$41.8 million per annum). An alternative mass-based CAC approach, which instead regulates nitrogen applications to land, has compliance costs of US$3.5-US$9.4 million per annum, depending on the strictness of the standard. By contrast, an environmentally equivalent economic instrument approach results in additional cost savings of 22-25 per cent. The results are of relevance to Mexican policy makers, extensionists, researchers, and farmers.
机译:在有关经济手段的成本最小化特性的广泛理论和经验工作的基础上,本文描述和分析了与尤卡坦州猪粪浆处理/处置有关的墨西哥立法。使用线性规划模型同时确定生猪生产和减排过程的最佳水平,比较了不同的政策工具和情景。确定了与最近引入的命令和控制(CAC)立法相关的严重缺陷,该立法建立了基于浓度的排放标准。事实证明,要遵守该法律极为困难且昂贵(费用:每年4180万美元)。一种替代的基于质量的CAC方法,而是对土地上的氮肥施用进行监管,根据标准的严格程度,其合规成本每年为3.5美元至940万美元。相比之下,在环境上等效的经济手段可以节省22-25%的成本。结果与墨西哥的决策者,推广人员,研究人员和农民有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号