...
首页> 外文期刊>Enterprise and Society >Escape from Equilibrium: Thinking Historically about Firm Responses to Competition
【24h】

Escape from Equilibrium: Thinking Historically about Firm Responses to Competition

机译:逃离平衡:关于企业对竞争的反应的历史思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Firms use a variety of strategies to limit competition that would otherwise erode profits. Firms innovate, creating new technologies, new markets, and new firms. Innovations allow them to distinguish their products or lower their costs and thus maintain profits. Their ability to innovate depends on the existence of social institutions that allow them to amass the resources—labor, capital, and information—necessary to compete successfully. Firms also maintain profits by manipulating the political process to maintain preferred access to markets, technology and resources. Finally, firms take actions to limit competition directly. Waves of consolidation, justified by an assumption of the inevitability of increasing firm size, have limited competition and entrepreneurship. Cartels and other forms of collusion, sometimes thought to have disappeared from US markets after the adoption of the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, are still active in a wide variety of national and international markets.
机译:企业使用各种策略来限制竞争,否则竞争就会侵蚀利润。公司进行创新,创造新技术,新市场和新公司。创新使他们能够区分自己的产品或降低成本,从而保持利润。他们的创新能力取决于社会机构的存在,这些机构可以使他们积聚成功竞争所必需的资源(劳动力,资本和信息)。公司还通过操纵政治程序来维持获利,以维持进入市场,技术和资源的优先渠道。最后,企业采取行动直接限制竞争。合并的浪潮(假设增加公司规模的必然性是有道理的)限制了竞争和企业家精神。卡特尔和其他形式的勾结,有时被认为是在1890年通过《谢尔曼反托拉斯法》后从美国市场上消失的,但它们仍然活跃在各种各样的国家和国际市场上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号