...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Reliability analysis of shear strength provisions for FRP-reinforced concrete beams
【24h】

Reliability analysis of shear strength provisions for FRP-reinforced concrete beams

机译:FRP筋混凝土梁抗剪强度规定的可靠度分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper is aimed at conducting a reliability based assessment on shear strength provisions of the existing design codes for fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) beams. Herein, shear design equations of the latest versions of ACI 440.1R and CSA S806, which are two of the most widely used codes for FRP-RC beams, are studied. The shear strength formula of ACI 440.1R is different from that of CSA S806 in that how they incorporate various parameters. It is, therefore, of interest to evaluate the reliability levels offered by these design equations. In doing so, the uncertainty in mechanical and geometrical variables, the error inherent in shear resistance models, and the probabilistic characteristics of various types of loads including dead, live, snow, wind, and earthquake under different load combinations are considered. The shear model errors have been assessed using a large database of shear-failed test results, which was assembled from literature and contained 288 FRP-RC beams without stirrup and 109 beams with FRP stirrups. It was revealed that the safety level for shear capacity of beams without stirrup is different from that for beams with stirrup in ACI, and to a lesser extent, in CSA. Moreover, the reliability indexes of shear strength of FRP-RC beams in ACI differ from those in CSA. In order to meet the target reliability index, the modified shear design formulae and the corresponding safety factors are proposed. Besides, the shear compression capacity, which proves to play a key role in the reliability index of shear strength of beams with FRP stirrups, is revised for different reliability levels.
机译:本文旨在对现有的纤维增强聚合物混凝土(FRP-RC)梁设计规范的抗剪强度规定进行基于可靠性的评估。在这里,研究了最新版本的ACI 440.1R和CSA S806的剪切设计方程,它们是FRP-RC梁使用最广泛的两种代码。 ACI 440.1R的抗剪强度公式与CSA S806的不同之处在于它们如何结合各种参数。因此,有必要评估这些设计方程式提供的可靠性水平。这样做时,要考虑机械和几何变量的不确定性,抗剪模型固有的误差以及在不同载荷组合下各种类型的载荷(包括静载荷,有生命载荷,积雪,风和地震)的概率特征。剪切模型误差已使用大量未通过剪切的测试结果数据库进行了评估,该数据库由文献汇编而成,包含288根不带箍筋的FRP-RC梁和109根带FRP箍筋的梁。结果表明,在ACI中,没有箍筋的梁的抗剪承载力的安全等级与在有箍筋的梁中的抗剪承载力的安全等级有所不同,而在CSA中,安全等级有所不同。此外,ACI中的FRP-RC梁抗剪强度的可靠指标与CSA中的不同。为了满足目标可靠性指标,提出了改进的剪切设计公式和相应的安全系数。此外,针对不同的可靠度水平,修改了被证明在FRP箍筋梁的抗剪强度可靠指标中起关键作用的抗剪压缩能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号