...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Electricity prices and firms' decisions and outcomes: The case of India after a decade of the Electricity Act
【24h】

Electricity prices and firms' decisions and outcomes: The case of India after a decade of the Electricity Act

机译:电价和公司的决定和结果:电力法案十年后印度的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper examines the impact of electricity tariff on electricity consumption pattern and performance of Indian firms. The question is addressed against the backdrop of the Electricity Act of 2003 which was implemented with varying degrees across different states. The paper uses the 2013-14 World Bank Enterprise Survey data for India and builds three sets of hypotheses- first, high tariffs lead to electricity consumption pattern shifting towards self-generation, a decline in total electricity used, substitution of capital with labor and eventually deterioration in the performance of firms. Second, the negative effect of tariff on the performance of firms is more pronounced in states that haven't implemented the Electricity Act effectively. Third, the effect will be stronger for firms that face relatively higher tariff as compared to other comparable consumer categories. Taking account of the endogeneity between a firm's performance outcomes and location choices, the paper uses appropriate econometric models and finds strong evidence for each of the hypotheses. High tariffs hamper the profitability and productivity of firms only in those states which have not implemented the Electricity Act effectively. Moreover, the above evidence only exists if there are high tariff differences between different consumer groups. Finally, we do not find evidence for performance impairment in large firms. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文探讨了电费对印度公司电力消费模式和表现的影响。问题是针对2003年电力法案的背景,其在不同国家的不同程度上实施。本文采用2013-14世界银行企业调查数据为印度建造三套假设 - 首先,高关税导致电力消耗模式转化为自发电,从而替代资本,劳动力替代资本,最终公司性能恶化。其次,关税对企业表现的负面影响在尚未实施电力的国家更加明显。第三,与其他可比较的消费类别相比,面临相对较高关税的公司的效果将更强大。考虑到公司性能结果和位置选择之间的内生成,本文使用适当的计量模型,为每个假设找到有力的证据。高关税妨碍公司的盈利能力和生产力仅在尚未实施电力的国家。此外,如果不同的消费者群体之间存在高关税差异,则上述证据仅存在。最后,我们没有找到大公司性能减值的证据。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy economics》 |2020年第9期|104915.1-104915.12|共12页
  • 作者

    Jain Ritika; Nandan Amit;

  • 作者单位

    Ctr Dev Studies Trivandrum 695011 Kerala India;

    Ctr Dev Studies Trivandrum 695011 Kerala India;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Power; Pricing; Electricity act; India;

    机译:权力;定价;电力法案;印度;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号