...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Optimizing geologic CO_2 sequestration by injection in deep saline formations below oil reservoirs
【24h】

Optimizing geologic CO_2 sequestration by injection in deep saline formations below oil reservoirs

机译:通过注入油藏下方的深层盐层来优化地质CO_2封存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this research is to present a best-case paradigm for geologic CO_2 storage: CO_2 injection and sequestration in saline formations below oil reservoirs. This includes the saline-only section below the oil-water contact (OWC) in oil reservoirs, a storage target neglected in many current storage capacity assessments. This also includes saline aquifers (high porosity and permeability formations) immediately below oil-bearing formations. While this is a very specific injection target, we contend that most, if not all, oil-bearing basins in the US contain a great volume of such strata, and represent a rather large CO_2 storage capacity option. We hypothesize that these are the best storage targets in those basins. The purpose of this research is to evaluate this hypothesis. We quantitatively compared CO_2 behavior in oil reservoirs and brine formations by examining the thermophysical properties of CO_2, CO_2-brine, and CO_2-oil in various pressure, temperature, and salinity conditions. In addition, we compared the distribution of gravity number (N), which characterizes a tendency towards buoyancy-driven CO_2 migration, and mobility ratio (M), which characterizes the impeded CO_2 migration, in oil reservoirs and brine formations. Our research suggests competing advantages and disadvantages of CO_2 injection in oil reservoirs vs. brine formations: (1) CO_2 solubility in oil is significantly greater than in brine (over 30 times); (2) the tendency of buoyancy-driven CO_2 migration is smaller in oil reservoirs because density contrast between oil and CO_2 is smaller than it between brine and oil (the approximate density contrast between CO_2 and crude oil is ~100 kg/m~3 and between CO_2 and brine is ~350 kg/m~3); (3) the increased density of oil and brine due to the CO_2 dissolution is not significant (about 7-15 kg/m~3); (4) the viscosity reduction of oil due to CO_2 dissolution is significant (from 5790 to 98 mPa s). We compared these competing properties and processes by performing numerical simulations. Results suggest that deep saline CO_2 injection immediately below oil formations reduces buoyancy-driven CO_2 migration and, at the same time, minimizes the amount of mobile CO_2 compared to conventional deep saline CO_2 injection (i.e., CO_2 injection into brine formations not below oil-bearing strata). Finally, to investigate practical aspects and field applications of this injection paradigm, we characterized oil-bearing formations and their thickness (capacity) as a component of the Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration (SWP) field deployments. The field-testing program includes specific sites in Utah, New Mexico, Wyoming, and western Texas of the United States.
机译:这项研究的目的是提出地质CO_2储存的最佳范例:在油藏下方的盐层中注入CO_2和封存。这包括油库中油水接触(OWC)下方的仅含盐部分,这是许多当前存储容量评估中忽略的存储目标。这还包括紧邻含油地层的盐水含水层(高孔隙度和渗透性地层)。尽管这是一个非常具体的注入目标,但我们认为,即使不是全部,美国大多数含油盆地都包含大量此类地层,并代表了相当大的CO_2储存能力选择。我们假设这些是这些盆地中最好的存储目标。本研究的目的是评估该假设。我们通过检查在不同压力,温度和盐度条件下的CO_2,CO_2-盐水和CO_2-油的热物理性质,定量比较了油藏和盐水层中CO_2的行为。此外,我们比较了油藏和盐水层中重力数(N)的分布和迁移率(M)的分布,重力数(N)表征浮力驱动的CO_2迁移趋势,迁移率(M)表征CO_2迁移受限。我们的研究表明,在储油层中注入CO_2相对于盐水形成具有竞争优势和劣势:(1)CO_2在石油中的溶解度显着大于在盐水中的溶解度(超过30倍); (2)浮力驱动的CO_2运移趋势在油藏中较小,因为油与CO_2之间的密度对比小于盐水与油之间的密度对比(CO_2与原油之间的近似密度对比为〜100 kg / m〜3和二氧化碳和盐水之间的含量约为350 kg / m〜3); (3)由于CO_2溶解导致油,盐水密度增加不明显(约7-15kg / m〜3); (4)由于CO_2溶解而使油的粘度降低显着(从5790到98 mPa s)。我们通过执行数值模拟比较了这些竞争特性和过程。结果表明,与常规深层盐水CO_2注入(即,向不低于含油层的盐水层中注入CO_2)相比,在油层之下立即注入深盐水CO_2减少了浮力驱动的CO_2迁移,同时使流动CO_2的量最小化地层)。最后,为了研究这种注入范例的实际情况和现场应用,我们将含油地层及其厚度(容量)作为西南地区碳固存伙伴关系(SWP)现场部署的组成部分进行了表征。现场测试程序包括在犹他州,新墨西哥州,怀俄明州和美国德克萨斯州西部的特定站点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Conversion & Management》 |2009年第10期|2570-2582|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Energy and Geoscience Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84105, USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Energy and Geoscience Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84105, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    CO_2 sequestration; brine; oil; multiphase flow; global warming;

    机译:二氧化碳封存;盐水;油;多相流全球暖化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号