...
首页> 外文期刊>Educational Research >An approach to participatory instructional design in secondary education: an exploratory study
【24h】

An approach to participatory instructional design in secondary education: an exploratory study

机译:中学参与式教学设计的一种探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Teachers have limited insight in students' perspectives on education, although these perspectives influence quality of learning. As students' and teachers' perspectives differ considerably, there is a need for teachers to learn more about students' experiences and ideas about education. Participatory design might be a good strategy for taking student perspectives into account in instructional design. In areas outside education, the positive effects of participation have already been demonstrated. Purpose: The main goals of this exploratory study are to develop an approach - based on the principles of participatory design - for student participation in instructional design, and to evaluate how students and teachers experience the discussion about possible changes in the design and how they co-operate in designing lessons. Additionally, the study investigates whether the used approach is workable and suitable for use with a range of courses. Sample: The sample consisted of six teachers (of mathematics, economics and English) from two secondary schools in the Netherlands and their 10th-grade pre-university students (N = 139; average age 16 years). In each class, a small group of seven co-designing students was selected as a representative sample of their class. All other students in these classes (i.e. those not directly involved in participatory re-design) were also included, as evaluators of the proposed changes. Design and methods: A participatory design meeting was organised for each group separately. In all groups, the same approach for participatory design was used. The quality of the meeting and the agreement with the proposed changes were evaluated using open questions. The questions were answered individually by both teachers and co-designing students. The remaining students answered questions about their agreement with the proposed changes. The written answers were analysed using a coding scheme. Results: Findings suggest that both teachers and co-designing students were largely satisfied with the meeting. The atmosphere was experienced predominantly as comfortable and enough opportunities were provided to express thoughts and ideas. Teachers, additionally, stated that the usability of students' suggestions was good. The remaining students predominantly agreed on the proposed changes discussed. No differences were found between the evaluation scores of students of different courses. Conclusions: The main conclusion from this exploratory study is that participatory design appears suitable for use in education. The approach used for initiating and structuring the discussion between the teacher and his/her students was appropriate for designing lessons, according to all those involved. As this study suggests, the barriers to the inclusion of students in the instructional design process are not insurmountable, and there are compelling reasons for implementing participatory design in education.
机译:背景:尽管教师的观点影响学生的学习质量,但他们对学生观点的了解有限。由于学生和教师的观点差异很大,因此需要教师更多地了解学生的经历和教育观念。参与式设计可能是在教学设计中考虑学生观点的好策略。在教育以外的领域,参与的积极作用已经得到证明。目的:本探索性研究的主要目标是开发一种基于参与设计原则的方法,让学生参与教学设计,并评估学生和教师如何体验有关设计中可能发生的变化以及他们如何共同参与的讨论。 -设计课程。此外,该研究调查了所使用的方法是否可行并且适合与一系列课程一起使用。样本:样本包括来自荷兰两所中学的六名教师(数学,经济学和英语)以及他们的10年级大学预科学生(N = 139;平均年龄16岁)。在每个班级中,选出一个由七个共同设计的学生组成的小组作为班级的代表性样本。这些班级中的所有其他学生(即那些不直接参与参与式重新设计的学生)也被包括在内,作为拟议变更的评估者。设计和方法:为每个小组分别组织了一个参与性设计会议。在所有组中,都采用了参与设计的相同方法。会议的质量和对拟议变更的同意均使用公开问题进行了评估。老师和共同设计的学生分别回答了这些问题。其余的学生回答了他们对拟议变更的同意的问题。使用编码方案对书面答案进行了分析。结果:调查结果表明,老师和合作设计的学生都对会议感到满意。气氛主要是舒适和提供足够的机会来表达思想和观念。教师还说,学生建议的可用性很好。其余的学生主要同意讨论的拟议更改。在不同课程的学生的评估分数之间没有发现差异。结论:这项探索性研究的主要结论是参与式设计似乎适合在教育中使用。所有相关人士认为,用于发起和安排教师与学生之间讨论的方法适合设计课程。正如这项研究表明的那样,将学生纳入教学设计过程中的障碍并非无法克服,并且在教育中实施参与式设计有令人信服的理由。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Research》 |2010年第1期|45-59|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands|Department of Educational Development & Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands;

    Centre of Learning Sciences and Technologies, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands;

    Department of Educational Development & Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands|Centre of Learning Sciences and Technologies, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    student perspectives; student participation; instructional design; student engagement; student-teacher interaction;

    机译:学生观点;学生参与;教学设计;学生参与度;师生互动;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号