...
首页> 外文期刊>Education + Training >Revisiting “technical” education
【24h】

Revisiting “technical” education

机译:回顾“技术”教育

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reconsider “technical” education on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the publication of the journal Education + Training. Design/methodology/approach – The approach adopted is that of providing a historical perspective on technical education and higher education engagement with vocationalism, skills and employers. It draws from this the key developments and places these in the recent contemporary policy setting with the new skills agenda. Findings – The findings are that the government has substituted technical education with “the skills agenda” and is applying it relentlessly across the whole education system, including schools, which in turn is leading to confusion, overlaps and needless competition. There is a need for a national debate on an integrated approach to practical learning wherever it takes place, while recognising that liberal education has its place in a developed society. Originality/value – This paper is one of a series commissioned by the journal on its 50th anniversary. Its originality stems from the subject matter and the author's interpretation of past technical education and contemporary practice.
机译:目的–本文的目的是在《教育与培训》杂志出版50周年之际重新考虑“技术”教育。设计/方法/方法–采用的方法是就技术教育和高等教育与职业主义,技能和雇主的互动关系提供历史观点。它从中汲取了关键的发展,并将其与新技能议程一起放在最新的当代政策环境中。调查结果–调查结果是,政府已用“技能议程”代替了技术教育,并在包括学校在内的整个教育体系中不懈地应用了技术教育,这反过来又导致了混乱,重叠和不必要的竞争。无论在何处进行,都需要就综合性实践学习进行全国性辩论,同时要认识到通识教育在发达社会中占有一席之地。原创性/价值-这篇论文是该杂志成立50周年的系列之一。它的独创性源于主题以及作者对过去的技术教育和当代实践的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号