首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >A RESPONSE TO ERIK SCHOKKAERT ON MACROJUSTICE
【24h】

A RESPONSE TO ERIK SCHOKKAERT ON MACROJUSTICE

机译:宏观法院对ERIK SCHOKKAERT的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Erik Schokkaert's note presents a very good summary of the theory of macrojustice and a very good list of the directions of research it points to. This is quite fitting since a research programme defines a paradigm, and he sees this proposal as a paradigm shift. This is also very appropriate since his own qualifications are the best for advancing fast in these research topics.I have only a very small number of qualifications to add to his presentation, but I prefer to begin with emphasizing the most important issues. Two aspects can be seen as the most important: the de facto axiomatic derivation of the solution ELIE and its application on the one hand, and the present state of scholarly studies of the optimum or just distribution of income on the other hand. Let us enter by the second door (as opposed to what is done in the book Macrojustice). This will lead us to conclude with a more synthetic and broader view of the basic logic of the paradigms of justice and of the surprising recent history of their interpretations.
机译:Erik Schokkaert的注释对宏观正义理论进行了很好的总结,并指出了它所指出的研究方向。这很合适,因为研究程序定义了范式,并且他认为该建议是范式的转变。这也是非常合适的,因为他自己的资格是在这些研究主题中快速晋升的最佳选择。我只有很少数量的资格要添加到他的演讲中,但是我希望从强调最重要的问题开始。可以将两个方面视为最重要的方面:一方面是解决方案ELIE的事实上的公理推导及其应用,另一方面是关于收入的最佳分配或公正分配的学术研究现状。让我们从第二扇门进入(与《 Macrojustice》这本书相反)。这将使我们以更加综合和广泛的观点来结束对正义范式的基本逻辑及其令人惊讶的近期解释历史的总结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号