首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
【24h】

COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION

机译:成本效益和残疾歧视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is widely recognized that prioritizing health care resources by their relative cost-effectiveness can result in lower priority for the treatment of disabled persons than otherwise similar non-disabled persons. I distinguish six different ways in which this discrimination against the disabled can occur. I then spell out and evaluate the following moral objections to this discrimination, most of which capture an aspect of its unethical character: it implies that disabled persons' lives are of lesser value than those of non-disabled persons; it constitutes "double jeopardy" or violates Frances Kamm's non-linkage principle; it conflicts with equality of opportunity; it conflicts with fairness, which requires ignoring (some/most) differential impacts of treatment; it wrongly gives lower priority to disabled persons for equally effective treatment; it conflicts with giving all persons an equal chance to reach their full potential; and, it is in conflict with giving priority to the worse off.
机译:人们普遍认识到,按医疗保健资源的相对成本效益来确定医疗资源的优先级会比其他类似的非残疾人享有更低的残疾人待遇。我将区分歧视残疾人的方式分为六种。然后,我阐述并评估以下对这种歧视的道德异议,其中大多数都反映了这种歧视的不道德特征:这意味着残疾人的生活价值低于非残疾人的生活;构成“双重危险”或违反弗朗西斯·卡姆的非联系原则;它与机会均等相冲突;它与公平相冲突,这就要求忽略(某些/大多数)治疗的不同影响;错误地使残疾人获得同等有效治疗的优先权降低;它与给予所有人平等机会以发挥其全部潜能相冲突;并且,这与优先考虑较差的情况发生冲突。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Economics & philosophy》 |2009年第1期|27-47|共21页
  • 作者

    Dan W. Brock;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号