...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Conserving focal insect groups in woodland remnants: The role of landscape context and habitat structure on cross-taxonomic congruence
【24h】

Conserving focal insect groups in woodland remnants: The role of landscape context and habitat structure on cross-taxonomic congruence

机译:保护林地残留的焦昆虫群:景观背景与栖息地结构对跨分类学会的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Determining the shared responses of different taxa to landscape modification is a key step for identifying which groups of species are good surrogates for other groups. Yet, surprisingly little is known about the spatial processes that drive cross-taxonomic congruence of diversity and how this knowledge can be used to improve the management of modified landscapes for biodiversity, especially insects. We investigated how assemblages of two ecologically important insect groups, wild bees and beetles, respond to different landscape contexts and habitat structure in an Australian agricultural landscape, and how this, in turn, influenced either group's potential as a surrogate for the other. Bee and ground-active beetle assemblages were sampled in remnant woodland patches in two landscape contexts: woodland patches surrounded by pine plantation and woodland patches surrounded by open grazing land. Bee species richness, and the richness of functionally-defined bee groups did not differ between landscape contexts, in contrast to beetles. We found that landscape context exerted a stronger effect on species composition than species richness of both groups. Although some landscape and habitat variables were useful in predicting the diversity of both insect groups, few were shared. Our findings showed that bee and beetles are poor surrogates for each other in landscapes that are highly modified. Our study highlighted the need to consider: (1) taxon-specific responses to landscape context, (2) the influence of different metrics of cross-taxonomic surrogacy and, (3) dissimilar ecological attributes among insect taxa when selecting insects as biodiversity surrogates. It should not be assumed that agricultural landscapes managed to conserve specific insects (e.g. bees) will necessarily benefit other insects.
机译:确定不同分类群的共享响应到景观修改是识别其他种群的良好代理人的关键步骤。然而,令人惊讶的是,令人惊讶的是,令人惊讶的是,驱动跨分类学会多样性以及如何用于改善生物多样性的改良景观的管理,尤其是昆虫的横向分类学会的空间过程令人惊讶的是。我们调查了两种生态上重要的昆虫群体,野生蜜蜂和甲虫的组装,反应澳大利亚农业景观中的不同景观背景和栖息地结构,以及这反过来如何影响任何一个群体作为另一个替代者的潜力。蜜蜂和地面活跃的甲虫组合在两个景观背景下被取样在残余的林地补丁中:由松树种植园包围的林地补丁,覆盖着露天放牧的土地。蜜蜂种类丰富,功能鉴定的蜜蜂组的丰富性在景观环境之间没有区别,与甲虫相比。我们发现景观上下文对物种组成的效果更强,而不是两组的物种丰富性。虽然一些景观和栖息地变量对于预测昆虫群体的多样性有用,但很少有共同分配。我们的研究结果表明,蜜蜂和甲虫在高度修改的景观中彼此彼此可怜的代理人。我们的研究强调了需要考虑的需要:(1)对景观背景的分类特定响应,(2)在选择昆虫作为生物多样性代理时,昆虫分类群不同度量和(3)不同的生态属性的影响。不应该假设致力于保护特定昆虫的农业景观(例如蜜蜂)必然会有益于其他昆虫。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号