...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Costs, quantity and toxicity: Comparison of pesticide indicators collected from FADN farms in four EU-countries
【24h】

Costs, quantity and toxicity: Comparison of pesticide indicators collected from FADN farms in four EU-countries

机译:成本,数量和毒性:四个欧盟国家的FADN农场收集的农药指标的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There is a growing demand in the last years for farm-level sustainability data reflected in various initiatives from farmers, science and food industries. An alternative to creating new tools and indicator assessment frameworks is to further develop existing farm monitoring systems, such as the EU-wide Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN), towards inclusion of sustainability-related data.This article reports on a study carried out within the EU-project FLINT comparing indicators for pesticide costs, application quantity and pesticide toxicity calculated for 416 farms in four EU countries (France, Germany, Hungary, Poland). The farm sample was a non-representative subsample of the national FADN samples in these countries. Major focus of the comparison was to analyse the suitability of the indicators for implementation in a large so-far primarily economic farm-level monitoring system, such as the FADN.The FADN currently includes farm-level expenditure for crop protection as the only indicator with reference to pesticides. We show that it is possible to extend the current FADN with reasonable effort towards indicators for pesticide application quantity (pesticide usage, treatment index) and pesticide toxicity (here exemplarily used: lethal dose 50 in rats), while the data demands of more elaborated indicators could not be met with the current system.The correlation between indicators, reflecting the extent to which indicators come to the same conclusion, was small between pesticide costs and pesticide usage or toxicity, thus the use of pesticide costs as an ecological indicator, as was done in other studies, cannot be recommended. A combined consideration in the FADN system of pesticide quantity and toxicity, which showed moderate correlation, could be a suitable approach instead.
机译:在农民,科学和食品工业的各种举措中反映的农业水平可持续发展数据,过去几年需求不断增长。创建新工具和指标评估框架的替代方案是进一步开发现有的农场监测系统,例如欧盟农场会计数据网络(FADN),以纳入与可持续性相关的数据。本文报告关于在内部进行的研究欧盟项目弗林特比较杀虫剂成本,应用数量和农药毒性的指标,在​​四个欧盟国家计算416个农场(法国,德国,匈牙利,波兰)。农场样本是这些国家国家FADN样本的非代表性。比较的主要重点是分析指标在大型到目前为止的经济农业农场监测系统中实施指标,例如FADN。FADN目前包括作为唯一指标的农作物保护的农业水平支出参考杀虫剂。我们表明,可以为当前的FADN扩展到农药应用量(农药使用,治疗指数)和农药毒性的指标(以下示例性地使用:大鼠致死剂量),而更具详细指标的数据需求无法满足目前的系统。指标之间的相关性,反映指标的程度与结论相同的程度,少于农药成本和农药使用或毒性,因此使用农药成本作为生态指标的使用在其他研究中完成,不能推荐。在农药量和毒性的FADN系统中的组合考虑,表明中等相关性,可以是合适的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号