...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Consumption-based biodiversity footprints - Do different indicators yield different results?
【24h】

Consumption-based biodiversity footprints - Do different indicators yield different results?

机译:基于消费的生物多样性足迹-不同的指标会产生不同的结果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Land use related to human consumption patterns leads to significant loss of biodiversity. Here, the implications of using different indicators in the calculation of biodiversity footprints caused by land use were analyzed. Footprints refer to the impacts related to the net consumption in a region. We calculated biodiversity footprints for 140 regions in the world with an environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output (EEMRIO) model. The EEMRIO links economic activities from the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) database with land use and four indicators of biodiversity loss. We included three alpha diversity indicators (loss of mean species abundance, relative abundance and relative species richness) and one indicator of gamma diversity (vulnerability-weighted relative species richness loss). While the three alpha diversity indicators reflect local diversity within a site, the gamma diversity indicator captures global diversity by weighting regional species richness with species' extinction vulnerability in a region. We found that the three alpha diversity footprints show close alignment (r(S) 0.93), while there was limited convergence between alpha and gamma diversity footprints (r(S) 0.22). The alpha diversity indicators identified a diverse set of regions with high per capita consumption-based biodiversity footprints across the globe, while the gamma diversity indicator emphasized human consumption patterns threatening particularly tropical biodiversity. Although all footprints are positively related to rising household expenditure, this relationship was weaker and highly uncertain for the gamma diversity footprints. The alpha-based footprints also showed a negative relationship with population density, while the gamma-based footprint was not related to population density. Our results highlight the relevance of including both alpha and gamma diversity indicators in land-based biodiversity footprint calculations.
机译:与人类消费模式有关的土地利用导致生物多样性的严重丧失。在这里,分析了在使用土地导致的生物多样性足迹计算中使用不同指标的含义。足迹是指与一个地区的净消费有关的影响。我们使用环境扩展的多区域投入产出(EEMRIO)模型计算了全球140个地区的生物多样性足迹。 EEMRIO将全球贸易分析项目(GTAP)数据库中的经济活动与土地利用和四个生物多样性丧失指标联系起来。我们包括了三个α多样性指标(平均物种丰富度,相对丰度和相对物种丰富度的损失)和一个伽玛多样性指标(脆弱性加权相对物种丰富度的损失)。虽然这三个alpha多样性指标反映了站点内的局部多样性,但gamma多样性指标通过将区域物种丰富度与某个区域的物种灭绝脆弱性相加权来捕获全球多样性。我们发现,三个alpha多样性足迹显示出紧密的一致性(r(S)> 0.93),而alpha和gamma多样性足迹之间的收敛性有限(r(S)<0.22)。阿尔法多样性指标确定了全球基于人均消费的生物多样性足迹较高的不同区域,而伽玛多样性指标则强调了人类消费模式,特别是热带生物多样性受到威胁。尽管所有足迹都与家庭支出的增加呈正相关,但这种关系在伽玛多样性足迹上较弱,并且高度不确定。基于alpha的足迹也与人口密度呈负相关,而基于gamma的足迹与人口密度无关。我们的结果突显了在基于土地的生物多样性足迹计算中同时包含alpha和gamma多样性指标的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号