...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Using acoustic indices to estimate wolf pack size
【24h】

Using acoustic indices to estimate wolf pack size

机译:使用声学指数估算狼群大小

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Acoustic indices were recently developed for biodiversity evaluation by measuring the acoustic heterogeneity generated by animals in natural environments. Some of these indices focus on the species diversity in a community by studying frequency and temporal variations in acoustic signals. We explored the possibility of using acoustic indices to estimate the population size of a specific species. More precisely, the objective was to estimate the size of grey wolf packs by testing six acoustic indices: H, Hf, Ht, M, AR, and ACI.The relationship between the averaged values of the indices and the number of howling wolves was studied based on artificial solos and choruses created from howls extracted from wolf choruses recorded in captivity. Then, 16 real choruses were used to test the size predictions based on index values calculated previously and considered as references. Finally, we explored three biases that might influence the acoustic index values and thus the chorus size estimates.All of the acoustic indices were positively correlated with chorus size, although large standard deviations were observed. Moreover, H, Hf, and Ht reached a plateau at 7-8 wolves. The size predictions based on real choruses were overestimated or underestimated. However, ACI was the most accurate with chorus size predictions close to the actual value. M and AR also had good predictive power, especially for choruses made by a relatively small number of howling wolves. The overestimates may be explained by several sources of bias related to the natural composition of real choruses. Indeed, the acoustic indices were influenced by the audio file duration, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and temporal overlap of the wolf howls, but not in the same manner for each index. In particular, H, Ht, and M were significantly influenced by the audio file duration and their values decreased as the duration increased. Excluding AR, all of the indices were affected by adding background noise. The H and Hf values decreased as the SNR decreased, but the opposite trend occurred for ACI. Only Hf and AR were not influenced by the temporal overlap of howls and the values of the four other indices decreased to a greater extent when more wolf howls overlapped.The most promising indices were ACI, AR, and Hf, and they may provide an innovative census tool for estimating wolf pack size. Our results are encouraging although further research is needed to obtain a more effective and accurate tool. Several recommendations and directions for further studies are discussed.
机译:通过测量自然环境中动物产生的声音异质性,最近开发了用于生物多样性评估的声音指数。其中一些指数通过研究声信号的频率和时间变化来关注社区中的物种多样性。我们探索了使用声学指数来估计特定物种种群数量的可能性。更准确地说,目的是通过测试六个声学指标(H,Hf,Ht,M,AR和ACI)来估计灰太狼群的大小。研究了指数平均值与values叫狼数量之间的关系。基于人工圈养和独奏,这些独奏和合唱团是从人工饲养的狼合唱团中提取的created叫而产生的。然后,使用16个真实的合唱来基于先前计算并视为参考的索引值来测试尺寸预测。最后,我们探索了可能影响声学指数值和合唱大小估计的三个偏差。尽管观察到较大的标准偏差,但所有声学指数均与合唱大小呈正相关。此外,H,Hf和Ht达到了7-8头狼的稳定水平。基于真实合唱的大小预测被高估或低估了。但是,ACI最准确,合唱大小预测值接近实际值。 M和AR也具有良好的预测能力,特别是对于由相对较少的of叫狼组成的合唱。高估可能是由与真实合唱的自然成分有关的几种偏见来解释的。实际上,声学指标受音频文件持续时间,信噪比(SNR)和狼how叫声的时间重叠的影响,但对于每个指标而言,它们的影响方式不同。特别是,H,Ht和M受音频文件持续时间的影响很大,并且它们的值随持续时间的增加而减小。除AR外,所有指标均受背景噪声影响。 H和Hf值随SNR的降低而降低,但ACI却出现了相反的趋势。只有Hf和AR不受by声的时间重叠影响,当更多的狼how声重叠时,其他四个指数的值会更大程度地下降。最有希望的指数是ACI,AR和Hf,它们可能提供创新估计狼群大小的人口普查工具。尽管需要进一步研究以获得更有效和准确的工具,但我们的结果令人鼓舞。讨论了一些进一步研究的建议和方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号