...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >How reliable is my historical land-use reconstruction? Assessing uncertainties in old cadastral maps
【24h】

How reliable is my historical land-use reconstruction? Assessing uncertainties in old cadastral maps

机译:我的历史土地利用重建的可靠性如何?评估旧地籍图的不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Old maps are a fundamental source for land-use reconstruction frequently used in biodiversity conservation and environmental management. In particular, cadastral maps as one type of old maps, depict both land tenure (discrete category) and land-use (continuous category); thus resulting in uncertainties in determination of individual parcels and their use. These uncertainties pose fundamental questions that are addressed in this paper: (i) to what extent land-use determined the delimitation of parcels?; (ii) how significant did the contrast between two land-use classes have to be to in order to delineate a new boundary? Agroforestry land-use classes were chosen as an example to demonstrate the approaches in the delimitation of parcels among different land-use combinations. We used Franciscan Cadastre, created in the mid-19th century under the Habsburg Monarchy (Central Europe), which depicts up to 10 agroforestry classes, to analyse factors that could influence delimitation of borders between patches (parcels) in old cadastral maps. The study area was located in the rural landscape of N Czechia, where approximately 10% of the agroforestry land area was used. We based our analysis on a detailed database of parcels and their land use type and property information. The novel approach to patch contrast indicator for old map analyses is introduced. The approach is based on statistical testing of the differences between parcel boundaries, separating similar/different owner, similar/different land-use and considering the length of the boundaries. Total number of identified parcels for all districts was 4108. Half of the boundaries length and 60% of boundaries count separated land of different owners. The rest of them separated land of one owner with different owner or with distinct parcels geometry. Our results indicate variable contrast between pairs of neighbouring land use categories. In particular, the contrast between pastures, wood-pastures and forests proved to be very low. Various factors, including land ownership, land-use, as well as landscape patch geometry and configuration were important to delineate a single parcel. We have concluded that these factors have important implications on inaccuracies and uncertainties of land use reconstructions based on old cadastral maps and used as historical baselines for current considerations on land change and environmental management.
机译:旧地图是经常用于生物多样性保护和环境管理的土地利用重建的基本来源。特别是,地籍图是一类旧地图,既描述了土地使用权(离散类别)又描述了土地利用(连续类别);因此,在确定单个包裹及其用途方面存在不确定性。这些不确定性提出了本文要解决的基本问题:(i)在何种程度上土地利用决定了包裹的划界? (ii)为了划定新的界限,两种土地利用类别之间的对比有多重要?以农林业土地利用类别为例,以说明在不同土地利用组合之间划分地块的方法。我们使用了19世纪中叶在哈布斯堡君主制下(中欧)创建的方济各会地籍,该农舍描述了多达10种农林业类,来分析可能影响旧地籍地图中各块(宗地)之间边界划定的因素。研究区域位于N Czechia的乡村景观中,约有10%的农林业用地被使用。我们的分析基于包裹的详细数据库及其土地使用类型和财产信息。介绍了用于旧地图分析的补丁对比度指示符的新颖方法。该方法基于对地块边界之间差异的统计测试,将相似/不同所有者,相似/不同土地利用分开并考虑边界的长度。所有地区的已识别宗地总数为4108。边界长度的一半和边界的60%计数了不同所有者的分开的土地。它们的其余部分将一个所有者的土地分开,该所有者具有不同的所有者或具有不同的宗地几何形状。我们的结果表明,成对的相邻土地利用类别之间存在可变的对比。尤其是,牧场,木草和森林之间的对比度非常低。划定单个地块的重要因素包括土地所有权,土地使用以及景观斑块的几何形状和配置。我们得出的结论是,这些因素对基于旧地籍图的土地利用重建的不准确性和不确定性具有重要影响,并被用作当前关于土地变化和环境管理的历史基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号