...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Can bryophytes be used to characterize hydrologic permanence in forested headwater streams?
【24h】

Can bryophytes be used to characterize hydrologic permanence in forested headwater streams?

机译:苔藓植物可用于表征森林源头水流中的水文持久性吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recent court cases have questioned whether all headwater streams, particularly those that are not perennial, fall within the protective boundaries of the Clean Water Act. Rapid field-based indicators of hydrologic permanence are critically needed for jurisdictional determinations. The study objective was to determine whether characteristics of bryophyte assemblages in forested headwater streams can be useful indicators of hydrologic permanence. We sampled bryophytes from the channel thalweg at 113 sites across 10 forests in the U.S. which varied in hydrologic permanence. Hydrologic permanence was based on hydro-logic status during spring (wet season) and late summer (dry season) visits. Perennial sites had flow (surface or visibly interstitial) during both spring and summer visits. Intermittent sites flowed during spring but were either dry or had surface water limited to isolated pools in summer. Ephemeral sites did not have flow during either visit. The species composition significantly differed between ephemeral and perennial stream reaches. The species composition of intermittent streams overlapped with both ephemeral and perennial streams. Three species and six families were identified as indicators of particular permanence classes. Liverworts occurred more frequently at perennial than at intermittent or ephemeral sites. Bryophytes with cushion and turf growth forms were common to ephemeral sites, whereas mat and weft forms were more common to perennial sites. Acrocarpous mosses were more frequent at ephemeral than at perennial sites. The frequencies of bryophyte-moisture associations (derived from the literature) across the three permanence categories were significantly different. Species associated with dry habitats were more frequently encountered at ephemeral than perennial sites, whereas species associated with wet habitats were more frequent at perennial than ephemeral sites. Species richness varied among forests and permanence classes. Ephemeral sites tended to have higher species richness than perennial sites; however, this pattern did not hold for all forests. Bryophytes should be included among the tools for jurisdictional determinations, much like vascular plants are used to help delineate wetlands. Growth forms and higher level taxonomy of bryophytes (i.e., phyla) can be particularly useful for making jurisdictional determinations because of their ability to discriminate ephemeral from intermittent and perennial reaches and they are measures that can be rapidly trained and routinely used by agencies making such determinations.
机译:最近的法院案件质疑所有的源头水流,特别是那些不是多年生的源头,是否都属于《清洁水法》的保护范围之内。对于管辖权的确定,迫切需要基于现场的快速水文持久性指标。研究目的是确定森林上游水源中的苔藓植物组合特征是否可以作为水文持久性的有用指标。我们从Thalweg河道的苔藓植物中采样了美国10个森林中113个地点,这些地点的水文持久性各不相同。水文持久性是基于春季(湿季)和夏末(旱季)探访的水文状况。在春季和夏季探访期间,多年生植物都出现了流动(表面或可见的间质性)。春季间歇性流动,但夏季干燥或地表水仅限于孤立的水池。每次访问期间临时站点都没有流量。短暂的和多年生的河段之间的物种组成明显不同。间歇流的物种组成与短暂流和多年生流重叠。确定了三个物种和六个科作为特定永久性类别的指标。多年生艾蒿的发生频率高于间歇或短暂地点。具有坐垫和草皮生长形式的苔藓植物在短暂的地方很常见,而垫层和纬线的形式在多年生植物的地方更常见。短暂的顶峰苔藓比多年生的地点高。三种持久性类别中苔藓植物与水分的关联(从文献中得出)的频率显着不同。与短暂生境相比,与短暂生境有关的物种比在常年性地点更常见,而与短暂生境相比,常年与湿生境相关的物种比短暂性地点更常见。物种丰富度因森林和永久性类别而异。临时地点往往比多年生地点具有更高的物种丰富度。但是,这种模式并不适用于所有森林。苔藓植物应包括在管辖权确定的工具中,就像维管植物被用来帮助划定湿地一样。苔藓植物(即种)的生长形式和较高级别的分类法,尤其对做出管辖权决定特别有用,因为它们能够区分短暂性和多年生的短暂性和短暂性,并且它们是可以迅速进行培训并由决定性决定的机构常规使用的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号