...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Perennial polypores as indicators of annual and red-listed polypores
【24h】

Perennial polypores as indicators of annual and red-listed polypores

机译:多年生孢子作为年度和红色上市的孢子的指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Many polypores are specialized in their requirements for substrate and environment, and they have been suggested to indicate the continuity of coarse woody debris or naturalness of a forest stand. However, the use of polypores as indicators of conservation value is restricted by the temporally limited appearance of annual fruit bodies. We studied whether the species richness of perennial polypores (perennials) can be used to predict the species richness of annual or annual red-listed polypores (annuals). Our data included 1471 separate datasets (sample plots or larger inventoried areas) in different parts of Finland and Russian Karelia, ranging from the southern to northern boreal zone. At the large scale (the whole area) the number of perennials explained about 70% of the variation in the number of annuals, and about 67% in the number of red-listed annuals. A minimum set of 40-60 perennial occurrences gave a reliable estimate on the species richness of annuals, and 60-80 occurrences on the species richness of red-listed annuals. The richness of perennials predicted the richness of annuals and, in particular, richness of red-listed annuals, better than the size of inventoried area. According to our results, perennial polypores can be used as a surrogate for overall polypore species richness in natural and seminatural boreal forests, but the predictive power is weaker in managed forests. In addition, the relationship between the perennial and annual species seems to differ in different vegetation zones, management types and forest types. Due to this variation direct application of the indicator values derived from different vegetation zones and management or forest types are not recommended. Since perennials are easier to identify than annuals, detectable throughout the year, and have much smaller year-to-year variation, their use as an indicator group seems to offer advantages regarding the timing and cost-efficiency of inventories.
机译:许多多孔材料专门针对其对基质和环境的要求,并且已建议它们表明粗糙的木质碎屑的连续性或林分的自然性。但是,一年生子实体在时间上有限的出现限制了使用多孔作为保存价值的指标。我们研究了多年生多孔类(多年生植物)的物种丰富度是否可用于预测年度或年度红色上市多孔类(年生物种)的物种丰富度。我们的数据包括芬兰和俄罗斯卡累利阿不同地区的1471个单独的数据集(样本图或较大的清单区域),范围从北方到北部寒带。在大规模(整个地区)中,多年生植物的数量解释了年数量变化的大约70%,而被列入红色名单的年数量大约占67%。至少有一组40-60个多年生植物,可以对一年生植物的物种丰富度进行可靠的估计,而对于一组60-80个在红名单上的物种中,则可以对物种丰富度进行可靠的估计。多年生植物的丰富度预示了一年生植物的丰富度,尤其是红色名录中的一年生植物的丰富度,优于存货面积的大小。根据我们的研究结果,多年生的多孔隙可以作为天然和半天然的北方森林中总的多孔隙物种丰富度的替代物,但在人工林中,其预测能力较弱。此外,多年生物种与一年生物种之间的关系似乎在不同的植被区,管理类型和森林类型中有所不同。由于这种变化,不建议直接应用源自不同植被带和管理或森林类型的指标值。由于多年生植物比一年生植物更容易识别,全年都可检测到,并且年际差异小得多,因此,将其用作指标组似乎在盘存的时间和成本效率方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号