...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Choosing the best method for stream bioassessment using macrophyte communities: Indices and predictive models
【24h】

Choosing the best method for stream bioassessment using macrophyte communities: Indices and predictive models

机译:选择利用大型植物群落进行河流生物评估的最佳方法:指标和预测模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The bioassessment and monitoring of the ecological status of rivers using macrophytes has gained new momentum since macrophytes were recognised as biological quality elements for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD; EU/2000/60). Our objectives were to test the suitability of two predictive modelling approaches to macrophyte communities as a tool for water quality assessment, and to compare their performance with other more common approaches-the use of macrophytes as indicators of the trophic status of rivers and multimetric indices. We used floristic and environmental data that were collected in the spring of 2004 and 2005 from around 400 sites on rivers across mainland Portugal, western Iberia. We build two predictive models: MACPACS (MACrophyte Prediction And Classification System) and MAC(Macrophyte Assessment and Classification) based on RIVPACS and the BEAST methods, respectively. Whereas MACPACS is derived from taxa occurrence data, MAC uses a quantitative measure of taxa abundance. Both models showed good performance in predicting reference sites to the correct group and low rate of misclassification errors. However, they performed differently. MAC depicts a reliable response to the overall human-mediated degradation of fluvial systems, as does the multimetric index (RVI, Riparian Vegetation Index), but MACPACS presented only a poor correlation with the Global Human Disturbance Index and with the nutrients input. The incorporation of abundance data in vegetation predictive models appears to be particularly important to the detection of high levels of degradation. The values for correlations with physical-chemical pressure variables were lower than expected for MTR (Mean Trophic Rank) due to an insufficient number of scoring species found in Portuguese fluvial systems. Our results suggest that the most effective methods for bioassessment in Mediterranean-type rivers are either the RVI or the MAC predictive model.
机译:自从大型植物被认为是执行《欧洲水框架指令》(WFD; EU / 2000/60)的生物质量要素以来,使用大型植物对河流的生态状况进行生物评估和监测获得了新的动力。我们的目标是测试两种预测建模方法对大型植物群落作为水质评估工具的适用性,并将其性能与其他更常见的方法进行比较-使用大型植物作为河流营养状况的指标和多指标指标。我们使用了2004年和2005年春季从伊比利亚西部葡萄牙大陆的河流上约400个站点收集的植物和环境数据。我们分别基于RIVPACS和BEAST方法建立了两个预测模型:MACPACS(宏观植物预测和分类系统)和MAC(宏观植物评估和分类)。 MACPACS是从分类单元出现数据中得出的,而MAC使用定量的分类单元丰度度量。两种模型在预测正确组的参考位点方面均表现出良好的性能,并且错误分类错误率低。但是,他们的表现有所不同。 MAC描绘了对人类介导的河流系统整体退化的可靠响应,多指标指标(RVI,河岸植被指数)也是如此,但MACPACS与全球人类干扰指数和养分输入之间的相关性很差。将丰度数据纳入植被预测模型似乎对于检测高水平的退化特别重要。与物理化学压力变量的相关性值低于MTR(平均营养等级)的预期值,原因是在葡萄牙河流系统中发现的评分物种数量不足。我们的结果表明,在地中海型河流中进行生物评估的最有效方法是RVI或MAC预测模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号