...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >The relative performance of taxonomic vs. environmental indicators for local biodiversity assessment: A comparative study
【24h】

The relative performance of taxonomic vs. environmental indicators for local biodiversity assessment: A comparative study

机译:分类学与环境指标在当地生物多样性评估中的相对表现:一项比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Direct diversity measurements usually require more resources and knowledge than those available, so surrogates are needed. The two main types of surrogates are environmental indicators, physical characteristics of the environment, and taxonomic indicators, a taxon or subsets of taxa used to reflect other taxa in the ecosystem. The relative merit of these two surrogate types, though hotly debated, has rarely been investigated directly. Here we compared the relative efficacy of environmental vs. taxonomic indicators in representing local scale patterns of species richness, rarity, endemism, and composition. The study was conducted in the Mediterranean ecosystem of the Jerusalem Mountains and the Judean Foothills, Israel. A detailed study of eight taxa (vascular plants, ground dwelling beetles, moths, spiders, scorpions, diplopods, small mammals, and small reptiles) and of coarse-resolution habitat types and fine-resolution environmental indicators was conducted in 40,1000 m~2 plots representing the different habitats in the region. Fine-resolution environmental indicators generally outperformed taxonomic indicators in reflecting diversity patterns, but their performance varied considerably between taxa and diversity measures, and on average they conveyed less than 55% of the variation in diversity patterns. Coarse-resolution habitat types failed to reflect diversity patterns. Plant species richness contributed to representation of diversity patterns of some taxa, but it needs to be combined with structural aspects of the vegetation in order to improve prediction power and expand the diversity aspects addressed. Composition patterns were poorly represented by either indicator used. We conclude that fine-resolution environmental indicators are suitable for general indication of local richness, rarity, and endemism patterns in Mediterranean ecosystems. Mapping these patterns at high resolution requires direct detailed surveys, or the application of other indicators.
机译:直接分集测量通常需要比可用的更多的资源和知识,因此需要替代。替代物的两种主要类型是环境指标,环境的物理特征和分类指标,即用于反映生态系统中其他分类单元的分类单元或分类单元的子集。尽管这两种替代类型的相对优缺点引起了激烈的争论,但很少直接进行调查。在这里,我们比较了环境指标和生物分类指标在代表物种丰富度,稀有性,特有性和组成的局部尺度模式方面的相对效力。该研究是在耶路撒冷山脉和以色列的犹大山麓丘陵的地中海生态系统中进行的。在40,1000 m〜的范围内,对八类生物(维管植物,陆生甲虫,飞蛾,蜘蛛,蝎子,双足类,小型哺乳动物和小型爬行动物)以及具有较高分辨率的栖息地类型和精细环境指标进行了详细研究。 2个地块,代表该地区的不同栖息地。精细分辨率的环境指标在反映多样性模式方面通常胜过生物分类指标,但分类和多样性措施之间的表现差异很大,平均而言,它们传达的多样性模式差异不到55%。粗分辨率的栖息地类型未能反映出多样性模式。植物物种丰富度有助于某些分类单元的多样性模式的表现,但需要将其与植被的结构方面结合起来,以提高预测能力并扩展所涉及的多样性方面。使用的任何一种指标都无法很好地代表构图模式。我们得出的结论是,高分辨率的环境指标适用于地中海生态系统中本地丰富度,稀有性和地方性模式的一般指示。要以高分辨率绘制这些模式,就需要直接进行详细调查或应用其他指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号