...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Operational performance indicators for litter management at festivals in semi-natural landscapes
【24h】

Operational performance indicators for litter management at festivals in semi-natural landscapes

机译:半自然景观节日中垃圾管理的运营绩效指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Huge open-air festivals with more than 50,000 visitors have become a common but scarcely studied land-use practice in many countries of the world. The environmental consequences of crowds such as litter accumulation and damage to vegetation are increasingly being taken into account by event managers. At present, many festivals use overall solid waste amount as an indicator of their waste management performance. However, these operational performance indicators (OPIs) do not reflect either the success of individual litter reduction measures or the damage to valuable habitats. We developed specific OPIs for solid waste littering and compared absolute littering and littering per person at three open-air festivals in Germany across different festival zones and phases. For one festival, we established a CIS to relate sensitive habitats to waste littering. Differences in litter indicators across event zones and phases as well as the impact of litter-reducing measures were tested using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM). Waste littering reached values up to 350gh~(-1) m~(-2), mainly in the form of glass bottles. Stage, path, food, and sanitation zones showed significantly higher littering per hour and per area than entrance zones, and littering was significantly lower during the arrival phase than during the event and departure phases. Fencing in combination with entrance controls, bin allocation, and participatory litter collection systems decreased overall littering significantly. In addition, requiring deposits for cups and providing visitor information on banners significantly impacted littering of residual (non-glass) waste. Festivals led to a clear short-term decrease in vegetation cover. Mapping waste littering in relation to valuable habitats highlights the conflict between festival use and nature conservation. We conclude that fencing, bin allocation, and participatory litter collection systems are the most efficient measures to reduce littering at festivals and should have high priority in valuable habitats. In particular, event planners should develop specific measures for waste-intensive stage, path, food, and sanitation zones. Overall, the study provides evidence that specific OPIs are more effective at assessing litter management at huge festivals than general OPIs.
机译:在世界上许多国家,有超过50,000名游客的大型露天节日已成为一种普遍但很少研究的土地使用方式。活动管理人员越来越多地考虑到人群的环境后果,例如垃圾堆积和植被破坏。目前,许多节日都将固体废物总量作为其废物管理绩效的指标。但是,这些运营绩效指标(OPI)既未反映出减少单个凋落物措施的成功,也未反映出对宝贵生境的破坏。我们针对固体垃圾乱抛垃圾制定了特定的OPI,并比较了德国在不同节日区域和阶段的三个露天节上的绝对垃圾和人均乱抛垃圾。对于一个节日,我们建立了一个CIS,以将敏感的栖息地与乱抛垃圾相关联。使用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)测试了事件区域和阶段之间的垫料指标差异以及减少垫料措施的影响。废物乱抛垃圾的价值高达350gh〜(-1)m〜(-2),主要是玻璃瓶的形式。阶段,路径,食物和卫生区域的每小时和每区域的乱抛垃圾明显高于入口区域,并且在到达阶段的乱抛垃圾明显低于事件和出发阶段的乱抛垃圾。围栏与入口控制,垃圾箱分配和参与式垃圾收集系统相结合,可显着减少整体垃圾。此外,要求存放杯子并在横幅上提供游客信息,这对残渣(非玻璃)废物的乱抛垃圾影响很大。节日导致植被短期明显减少。绘制与有价值的栖息地相关的废物乱扔图,突出了节日的使用与自然保护之间的冲突。我们得出的结论是,围栏,垃圾箱分配和参与式垃圾收集系统是减少节日乱扔垃圾的最有效措施,应在有价值的栖息地中予以高度重视。特别是,活动策划者应针对浪费密集的阶段,路径,食物和卫生区域制定具体措施。总体而言,该研究提供的证据表明,特定的OPI比大型OPI更能有效地评估大型节日的垃圾管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号