...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Application and reassessment of the reduced species list index for macroalgae to assess the ecological status under the Water Framework Directive in the Atlantic coast of Southern Spain
【24h】

Application and reassessment of the reduced species list index for macroalgae to assess the ecological status under the Water Framework Directive in the Atlantic coast of Southern Spain

机译:应用和重新评估大型藻类物种清单指数以评估西班牙南部大西洋沿岸水框架指令规定的生态状况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

According to the Water Framework Directive (WFD) macroalgae are one of the Biological Quality Elements proposed to assess the ecological status of coastal water bodies. In the case of the North East Atlantic coastal shores, two methodologies have been implemented (RSL - reduced species list - in the U.K.; CFR - quality of rocky bottoms - in the Spanish Cantabric Sea). However, the ecological differences between these shores and the Atlantic coasts of Southern Spain imply a reassessment of these indices when applied to this water body. In this study, the RSLindex has been reassessed for the rocky shores of the Atlantic coast of Andalusia (south-western Spain). In addition, an ecological and a morphological approximation to this index have been compared. After successive field sampling in the period 2006-2010, a reduced species list was developed for this shore. Based on anthropogenic pressures (water turbidity, nutrients, metal concentration and the distance to sources of stress), 19 sites along the coast were classified in five quality status (high, good, moderate, poor and bad) as proposed in the WFD. According to this classification the RSL index was calibrated. Finally, the results of the reassessed RSL-index were compared with the water quality. Overall, most of the elements yielded a significant relationship with the water quality and showed significant differences among the ecological quality classification. The less significant boundary among ecological status is the one lying between good and high. The results showed that both approximations of the RSL index were suitable to assess the ecological status, being the ecological approximation more suitable. Furthermore, the data analysis pointed out the existence of two coastal fringes with a different intertidal composition of algal species: Atlantic Cadiz and the Gibraltar Strait.
机译:根据《水框架指令》(WFD),大型藻类是为评估沿海水体生态状况而提出的生物质量要素之一。对于东北大西洋沿海沿岸地区,已实施了两种方法(RSL-减少物种清单-在英国; CFR-岩石底部的质量-在西班牙的Cantabric海)。但是,这些海岸与西班牙南部大西洋海岸之间的生态差异意味着将这些指标应用于该水体时需要重新评估。在这项研究中,重新评估了安达卢西亚(西班牙西南)大西洋海岸多岩石海岸的RSLindex。另外,已经比较了该指数的生态学和形态学近似。在2006年至2010年期间进行了连续的野外采样之后,为该海岸制定了缩小的物种清单。根据人为压力(水的浊度,养分,金属浓度和到应力源的距离),按照WFD中的建议,将沿海的19个地点分为五个质量状态(高,好,中,差和差)。根据此分类,对RSL指数进行了校准。最后,将重新评估的RSL指数的结果与水质进行了比较。总体而言,大多数元素与水质产生显着关系,并且在生态质量分类之间显示出显着差异。生态状况中次要的边界是好与高之间的边界。结果表明,RSL指数的两个近似值都适合评估生态状况,而生态近似值更合适。此外,数据分析指出,存在两个沿潮带组成不同藻类的沿海带:大西洋卡迪斯和直布罗陀海峡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号