...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Issues in using landscape indicators to assess land changes
【24h】

Issues in using landscape indicators to assess land changes

机译:使用景观指标评估土地变化的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Landscape indicators, when combined with information about environmental conditions (such as habitat potential, biodiversity, carbon and nutrient cycling, and erosion) and socioeconomic forces, can provide insights about changing ecosystem services. They also provide information about opportunities for improving natural resources management. Landscape indicators rely on data regarding land cover, land management and land functionality. Challenges in using landscape indicators to assess change and effects include (1) measures of land management and attributes that are reliable, robust and consistent for all areas on the Earth do not exist, and thus land cover is more frequently utilized; (2) multiple types of land cover and management are often found within a single landscape and are constantly changing, which complicates measurement and interpretation; and (3) while causal analysis is essential for understanding and interpreting changes in indicator values, the interactions among multiple causes and effects over time make accurate attribution among many drivers of change particularly difficult. Because of the complexity, sheer number of variables, and limitations of empirical data on land changes, models are often used to illustrate and estimate values for landscape indicators, and those models have several problems. Recommendations to improve our ability to assess the effects of changes in land management include refinement of questions to be more consistent with available information and the development of data sets based on systematic measurement over time of spatially explicit land qualities such as carbon and nutrient stocks, water and soil quality, net primary productivity, habitat and biodiversity. Well-defined and consistent land-classification systems that are capable of tracking changes in these and other qualities that matter to society need to be developed and deployed. Because landscapes are so dynamic, it is crucial to develop ways for the scientific community to work together to collect data and develop tools that will enable better analysis of causes and effects and to develop robust management recommendations that will increases land's capacity to meet societal needs in a changing world.
机译:景观指标与环境条件(例如栖息地潜力,生物多样性,碳和养分循环以及侵蚀)和社会经济力量的信息相结合,可以提供有关不断变化的生态系统服务的见解。它们还提供有关改善自然资源管理机会的信息。景观指标依赖于有关土地覆盖,土地管理和土地功能的数据。使用景观指标评估变化和影响的挑战包括:(1)土地管理的措施和对地球上所​​有区域而言可靠,可靠且一致的属性不存在,因此土地覆盖率得到了更频繁的利用; (2)通常在单一景观中发现多种类型的土地覆被和管理,并且它们在不断变化,这使测量和解释变得复杂; (3)因果分析对于理解和解释指标值的变化至关重要,但随着时间的流逝,多种原因和影响之间的相互作用使得准确地归因于许多变化驱动因素尤其困难。由于复杂性,变量的绝对数量以及土地变化的经验数据的局限性,通常使用模型来说明和估算景观指标的值,这些模型存在一些问题。为提高我们评估土地管理变化影响的能力的建议,包括改进问题以使其与现有信息更加一致,并根据对空间明确的土地质量(例如碳和养分储量,水)随时间进行系统测量得出数据集以及土壤质量,净初级生产力,生境和生物多样性。需要开发和部署良好定义的,一致的土地分类系统,以跟踪与社会相关的这些和其他质量的变化。由于景观是如此动态,因此至关重要的是,必须为科学界开发方法,以共同努力收集数据和开发工具,从而能够更好地分析因果关系,并提出有力的管理建议,从而提高土地满足社会需求的能力。不断变化的世界。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号