...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Too much data is never enough: A review of the mismatch between scales of water quality data collection and reporting from recent marine dredging programmes
【24h】

Too much data is never enough: A review of the mismatch between scales of water quality data collection and reporting from recent marine dredging programmes

机译:太多的数据永远不够:回顾水质数据收集规模与最近的海洋疏programs计划的报告之间的不匹配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Water quality monitoring programmes have become integral components of efforts to identify the impact(s) of anthropogenic activities. In many programmes, however, it appears records are being collected at finer temporal scales than required to produce the information needed by end-users (e.g. managers). Such mismatches are of concern given that the effort and expense invested in collection and processing of unexploited records is effectively wasted. Consequently, we were interested in reviewing the temporal scales over which water quality records have been collected, analysed and reported in monitoring programmes. Our case study focussed on turbidity (NTU) records collected from the monitoring of key dredging programmes (n = 8) initiated on the northern Australian coastline between 2006 and 2012. The review of (primarily grey) literature revealed that (a) there has been an increase in the number of turbidity records collected per day over time, a pattern driven by fine scale temporal records being taken at an increasing number of sites, and, (b) although these records are typically acquired multiple times per day for all loggers, a daily summary measure is commonly reported (e.g. median, rolling or exponentially weighted moving average), with some programmes reporting a subset of the spatial detail acquired (e.g. averages of dual loggers, exclusion of records from 'backup' stations). This pattern of analysis and reporting removes fine scale detail from summaries provided to end-users, driving monitoring programmes to become relatively 'data-rich but information-poor'. We suggest that iteratively designing monitoring programmes based on the outcomes of previous experiences could facilitate the collection of datasets with higher information content (i.e. fewer records that are not used to produce information), ultimately increasing the efficiency of future monitoring programmes.
机译:水质监测计划已经成为确定人为活动影响的组成部分。但是,在许多计划中,似乎正在以比产生最终用户(例如经理)所需信息所需的更好的时间尺度收集记录。考虑到有效地浪费了在未利用记录的收集和处理上投入的精力和费用,这种不匹配是令人担忧的。因此,我们有兴趣审查在监测计划中收集,分析和报告水质记录的时间尺度。我们的案例研究着重于从2006年至2012年之间在澳大利亚北部海岸线上开始的关键挖泥项目(n = 8)的监测中收集的浊度(NTU)记录。对(主要为灰色)文献的回顾表明(a)随着时间的推移,每天收集的浊度记录数量增加,在越来越多的站点上采用了由精细的临时记录驱动的模式,并且(b)尽管所有记录仪通常每天都会多次获取这些记录,通常会报告每日汇总度量(例如,中位数,滚动或指数加权移动平均值),有些程序报告所获取的空间细节的子集(例如,双记录器的平均值,不包括来自“备份”站的记录)。这种分析和报告模式从提供给最终用户的摘要中删除了详细的细节,从而使监视程序变得相对“数据丰富但信息贫乏”。我们建议基于先前经验的结果迭代设计监视程序可以促进信息内容含量更高的数据集的收集(即较少的不用于产生信息的记录),最终提高未来监视程序的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号