...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >The applicability of macrophyte compositional metrics for assessing eutrophication in European lakes
【24h】

The applicability of macrophyte compositional metrics for assessing eutrophication in European lakes

机译:大型植物组成指标在欧洲湖泊富营养化评估中的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The European Water Framework Directive adopted in 2000, despite being prescriptive, has stimulated the development of a diverse array of biological assessment methods in Europe. The multitude of indicators currently used in biomonitoring lacks consistency and thus constrains the comparability of assessments at an international scale. Therefore, there is an argument to define and validate metrics with more universal application that can be applied EU-wide. We explored two metrics based on macrophyte taxonomic composition, the empirically based Intercalibration Common Metric for lake macrophytes (ICM_(LM)) and the expert-based Ellenberg Index (EI), for their ability to detect eutrophication in different types of European lowland lakes. Data from 1474 unique lake-years from 11 countries were used to explore relationships between these metrics and the seasonal mean concentration of total phosphorus (TP) using linear regression. ICM_(LM) gave a linear and relatively strong (R = 0.72, p < 0.0001) response over the entire spectrum of TP concentrations, whereas EI performed best in lakes with the TP concentrations up to 250 μg L~(-1) (R = 0.64, p< 0.0001) and was largely insensitive to higher phosphorus concentrations. Both metrics performed better in Nordic lakes than in the Central-Baltic ones. The responses of both metrics to TP were not modified or only very weakly modified by altitude, lake size and mean depth but were significantly affected by alkalinity. The ICM_(LM)-TP relationship was stronger in lakes with water alkalinity > 0.2 meq L~(-1) and significantly weaker in less buffered lakes. EI performed better in lakes with alkalinity < 1.0 meq L~(-1), whereas in high alkalinity lakes the response was significantly weaker. In all the lakes and in lakes from all the size, depth and alkalinity types, ICM_(LM) was more strongly correlated with TP than EI and was proportionally less sensitive to alkalinity. We also tested the effect of including helophytes on the metric response to eutrophication pressure by comparing the strength of the relationships to TP of the Ellenberg Index calculated firstly using only hydrophyte taxa (EI'_(HYDR)) and secondly using all macrophyte taxa including both hydrophytes and emergent vegetation (EI'_(TOT)). The differences in metric performance in all the lakes and all the size, depth and alkalinity types, except for the Nordic lakes, were non-significant. Thus, including helophytes generally did not significantly improve the strength of the EI-TP relationships.
机译:尽管有规定,2000年通过的《欧洲水框架指令》却刺激了欧洲各种生物评估方法的发展。目前在生物监测中使用的许多指标缺乏一致性,因此限制了国际范围内评估的可比性。因此,存在一种论点,即可以在整个欧盟范围内使用更通用的应用程序来定义和验证指标。我们探索了基于大型植物分类学组成的两个度量标准,即基于经验的湖泊大型植物间校准通用度量(ICM_(LM))和基于专家的Ellenberg指数(EI),以了解它们在不同类型的欧洲低地湖泊中发现富营养化的能力。使用来自11个国家/地区的1474个独特湖泊年的数据,通过线性回归研究了这些指标与总磷的季节性平均浓度(TP)之间的关系。 ICM_(LM)在整个TP浓度范围内均表现出线性且相对较强的响应(R = 0.72,p <0.0001),而EI在TP浓度高达250μgL〜(-1)时表现最佳。 = 0.64,p <0.0001),并且对较高的磷浓度不敏感。在北欧湖泊中,这两个指标都比中波罗的海地区更好。海拔,湖泊大小和平均深度对两种指标对总磷的响应都没有改变或只有很小的改变,但受碱度的影响很大。在水碱度> 0.2 meq L〜(-1)的湖泊中,ICM_(LM)-TP关系更强,在缓冲较少的湖泊中,ICM_(LM)-TP关系更弱。在碱度<1.0 meq L〜(-1)的湖泊中,EI表现较好,而在高碱度的湖泊中,响应明显较弱。在所有湖泊以及所有大小,深度和碱度类型的湖泊中,ICM_(LM)与TP的相关性都比EI高,而对EI的敏感性则成比例地降低。我们还通过比较首先使用仅水生植物类群(EI'_(HYDR))和其次使用所有大型植物类群(包括两者)计算出的埃伦贝格指数TP关系的强度来测试了包括杂种植物对富营养化压力度量响应的影响水生植物和紧急植被(EI'_(TOT))。除北欧湖泊外,所有湖泊以及所有大小,深度和碱度类型的度量标准性能差异均不显着。因此,包括生植物通常不会显着改善EI-TP关系的强度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2014年第10期|407-415|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Environmental Protection-National Research Institute, Kolektorska 4, 01-692 Warsaw, Poland;

    University of Stirling, Biological & Environmental Science, Stirling FK9 4LA, United Kingdom;

    Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, United Kingdom;

    Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Limnology, 61117 Rannu, Tartu, Estonia;

    Aarhus University, Institute for Bioscience, Vejsovej 25, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark;

    Finnish Environment Institute - SYKE, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 413, 90014 Oulu, Finland;

    Norwegian Institute for Water Research - NIVA, Gaustadalleen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway;

    Deltares, Inland Water Systems, P.O. Box 177, 2600 MH Delft, The Netherlands;

    Norwegian Institute for Water Research - NIVA, Gaustadalleen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway;

    Irstea, UR REBX, 50 Avenue de Verdun, 33612 Cestas Cedex, France;

    Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7050, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden;

    Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Limnology, 61117 Rannu, Tartu, Estonia;

    Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Limnology, 61117 Rannu, Tartu, Estonia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Lakes; Macrophyte metrics; Taxonomic composition; Eutrophication;

    机译:湖泊大型植物指标;分类组成;富营养化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号