...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Predicting aquatic vertebrate assemblages from environmental variables at three multistate geographic extents of the western USA
【24h】

Predicting aquatic vertebrate assemblages from environmental variables at three multistate geographic extents of the western USA

机译:根据美国西部三个多州地理范围内的环境变量预测水生脊椎动物群落

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Variables for predicting assemblage differences change as the geographic extent of studies change, hindering development of useful predictive models where study data are limited, or where the chief predictive variables available are fish zones, river size, physiographic regions, ecoregions, hydrologic units, and river basins. In addition, some studies have shown that site-scale predictor metrics have accounted for more of the variation in fish assemblage response metrics than catchment-scale metrics and other studies have shown the reverse. We used cluster analysis on a 780-site database to determine 12-15 aquatic vertebrate clusters at three geographic extents (all 12 conterminous western U.S. states, all western mountain ecoregions, Pacific Northwest mountain ecoregions). Next, we determined predictor variables for those assemblage clusters through use of stepwise discriminant function analysis. Site longitude, site latitude, and catchment dam count were the most significant predictors at the three geographic extents. Site-scale variables represented most of the significant predictors for all three geographic extents, but explained only slightly more aquatic vertebrate assemblage variance than catchment or pure spatial variables. Catchment- and site-scale classification variables accounted for less than half the mean within-cluster similarity demonstrated by the aquatic vertebrate assemblage clusters. We conclude that (a) the large geographic extent of the analysis did not result in catchment-scale predictor variables being more important than site-scale predictors, (b) both catchment- and site-scale variables are important predictors, and (c) existing river basin and ecoregion classifications are useful but insufficient predictors of aquatic vertebrate assemblages. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:预测组合差异的变量会随着研究地理范围的变化而变化,从而阻碍了有用的预测模型的发展,这些模型的研究数据有限,或者可用的主要预测变量包括鱼区,河流大小,地理区域,生态区,水文单位和河流盆地。此外,一些研究表明,与集水规模相比,现场规模的预测指标占鱼类组合响应指标变化的原因更多,而其他研究则相反。我们在780个站点的数据库上进行了聚类分析,以确定了三个地理范围内的12-15个水生脊椎动物集群(所有12个美国西部相邻州,所有西部山区生态区,西北太平洋山区生态区)。接下来,我们通过使用逐步判别函数分析来确定这些集合簇的预测变量。在三个地理范围内,场地经度,场地纬度和集水坝数是最重要的预测指标。站点规模变量代表了所有三个地理范围的大多数重要预测因子,但仅解释了水生脊椎动物组合方差比流域或纯空间变量略多的情况。集水区和地点规模的分类变量所占比例不到水生脊椎动物组合集群所显示的平均集群内相似度的一半。我们得出的结论是:(a)分析的较大地理范围不会导致集水区规模的预测变量比现场规模的预测变量重要,(b)集水规模和现场规模的变量都是重要的预测因子,并且(c)现有的流域和生态区分类是有用的,但对水生脊椎动物组合的预测不足。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号