...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Assessing landscape eco-risk associated with hilly construction land exploitation in the southwest of China: Trade-off and adaptation
【24h】

Assessing landscape eco-risk associated with hilly construction land exploitation in the southwest of China: Trade-off and adaptation

机译:评估与中国西南丘陵建设用地相关的景观生态风险:权衡与适应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Choosing a suitable low-risk location by multi-criteria methods is commonly accepted in landscape planning. However, the low risk place demonstrated on spatial patterns may not completely satisfy the urbanization requirement. In this article, we consider that except for avoiding the risks by site selection on the map, risk adaptation methods should be adopted at landscape scale. Eight ecological risk indicators were defined under the hilly construction land exploitation policy in the southwest of China. Spearman's rank correlation was then used to ascertain if there were contradictions between hilly construction land exploitation induced ecological risk and present construction land distribution. The results showed a strong positive relevance between construction land and farmland occupancy risk at all such three scales as grid, watershed, and town, which meant a low farmland occupancy risk region may not be suitable for human dwellings. Three basic farmland adjustment scenarios were put forward as the risk adaptation to reduce human construction induced ecological risk instead of changing the building site. It was found that the function adjustment scenario, which focuses on landscape connectivity, was acceptable; and the integrated adjustment scenario, which focuses on the total ecological risk and landscape connectivity, was the most advisable. The structure adjustment scenario, which only focuses on the ecological risk for construction, was less fitted. In this way, it is suggested that besides risk avoidance measures, a reasonable integration of risk adaptation approaches is required in landscape ecological risk assessment. Both concepts of risk avoidance and adaptation should be combined and emphasized in landscape planning and management. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在景观规划中通常接受通过多准则方法选择合适的低风险位置。但是,在空间格局上显示的低风险场所可能无法完全满足城市化要求。在本文中,我们认为,除了通过在地图上选择地点来避免风险外,还应该在景观尺度上采用风险适应方法。根据我国西南丘陵地带开发政策,确定了八个生态风险指标。然后使用Spearman等级相关性来确定丘陵建设用地开发引起的生态风险与当前建设用地分配之间是否存在矛盾。结果表明,在网格,分水岭和城镇这三个尺度上,建设用地与耕地占用风险之间都具有很强的正相关性,这意味着耕地占用风险较低的区域可能不适合人类居住。提出了三种基本的农田调整方案,即通过风险适应来减少人为建筑引起的生态风险,而不是改变建筑工地。结果发现,侧重于景观连通性的功能调整方案是可以接受的;最可取的是以整体生态风险和景观连通性为重点的综合调整方案。仅关注建筑生态风险的结构调整方案不太适合。通过这种方式,建议除了风险规避措施外,还需要在景观生态风险评估中合理整合风险适应方法。在景观规划和管理中应结合并强调风险规避和适应这两个概念。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号